Just a note: please vote for these proposals as if they were correct and
I'll submit a fixed version later.
-scshunt
On Jul 29, 2015 16:15, "tmanthe2nd ." wrote:
> I Call for Judgement on this statement. "Proposals 7773 and 7774 will have
> no effect if passed"
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:11 P
It was CFJ 1625. "Where a proposal specifies a rule to amend by both number
and title, and the number and title given identify different rules, this
constitutes ambiguity that nullifies the attempted rule change."
That doesn't refer to when the other rule doesn't exist. But, the rules
say, "An inc
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:55 AM, omd wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:43 AM, tmanthe2nd . wrote:
> >> Proposals 7773 and 7774 gives the wrong ID number for the rule it amends.
> >> Rule 2455 does not exist. So, the proposals don't actually do anyt
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:55 AM, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:43 AM, tmanthe2nd . wrote:
>> Proposals 7773 and 7774 gives the wrong ID number for the rule it amends.
>> Rule 2455 does not exist. So, the proposals don't actually do anything.
>
> So they do. Nice catch.
Though if you as
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:43 AM, tmanthe2nd . wrote:
> Proposals 7773 and 7774 gives the wrong ID number for the rule it amends.
> Rule 2455 does not exist. So, the proposals don't actually do anything.
So they do. Nice catch.
Proposals 7773 and 7774 gives the wrong ID number for the rule it amends.
Rule 2455 does not exist. So, the proposals don't actually do anything.
6 matches
Mail list logo
