Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Actually, time for a test

2011-10-17 Thread omd
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Elliott Hird wrote: > Arguments: It'll come in with "BUS:" prefixed to the subject line if > approved; no mail client is going to merge two messages with different > subjects without any kind of threading info. iirc, not if it already has BUS:, so you can make you

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Actually, time for a test

2011-10-17 Thread Elliott Hird
On 17 October 2011 16:33, ais523 wrote: > There is threading info, though, as the two messages have the same ID. Will they? Even when the subject changes? I'd think mailman would change that, but if not... I was going to go through http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html to figure out how the "ide

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Actually, time for a test

2011-10-17 Thread ais523
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:58 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 16 October 2011 23:29, ais523 wrote: > > Arguments: Interestingly, a-b has decided not to forward the message > > without a list moderator approving it, which makes the situation even > > more interesting. > > Arguments: It'll come in wi

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Actually, time for a test

2011-10-17 Thread Elliott Hird
On 16 October 2011 23:29, ais523 wrote: > Arguments: Interestingly, a-b has decided not to forward the message > without a list moderator approving it, which makes the situation even > more interesting. Arguments: It'll come in with "BUS:" prefixed to the subject line if approved; no mail client

DIS: Actually, time for a test

2011-10-16 Thread Alex Smith
I CFJ on the statement "This is a CFJ". Evidence: The headers on this email as I send it don't match all the envelope addresses (it's sent to a-d, but BCCed to a-b). Arguments: I suspect many email clients will show it being delivered to a-d but not a-b, because it'll arrive via both routes; shou