On 27/06/2013 5:24 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 27 June 2013 23:23, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 26 June 2013 05:33, Malcolm Ryan wrote:
Let's make this interesting.
I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
"If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its
voting pe
On 27 June 2013 23:23, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 26 June 2013 05:33, Malcolm Ryan wrote:
>>
>> Let's make this interesting.
>>
>> I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
>>
>> "If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its
>> voting period, that player must immedia
On 26 June 2013 05:33, Malcolm Ryan wrote:
>
> Let's make this interesting.
>
> I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
>
> "If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its
> voting period, that player must immediately forfeit the game."
>
> M
I register Agora XX, pre
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Fool wrote:
> On 26/06/2013 12:09 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > 344 I'll defer to speaker's opinion on ongoing-ness in future.
> >
> > -Goethe
> >
>
> :VETO:
Ok, I vote against 344. -Goethe
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Fool wrote:
> On 26/06/2013 12:09 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I vote for 345-347 (think I already voted on 345)
>>
>> 344 I'll defer to speaker's opinion on ongoing-ness in future.
>>
>> -Goethe
>>
>
> :VETO:
Presumably, we could change the speaker. After a
On 26/06/2013 12:09 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I vote for 345-347 (think I already voted on 345)
344 I'll defer to speaker's opinion on ongoing-ness in future.
-Goethe
:VETO:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Fool wrote:
>
> [Missed one...]
>
> Here I'll just number and repeat the four new proposals that were made.
> You can vote by replying to this message, privately if you like.
> I'll send out a full report shortly.
>
> -Dan
>
> 344 (Yally):
>>
>> Amend Rule 326 to r
I used the word "forfeit" because it is already used in rule 113.
Blob
On 26/06/2013, at 11:20 PM, Michael Norrish wrote:
> I vote AGAINST 345 and 346 (what does forfeit mean, and does it prevent
> reregistration?)
>
> I vote FOR 344.
>
> Michael
>
>
> On 26/06/13 10:00 PM, Fool wrote:
>> He
For.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Michael Norrish
wrote:
> I vote FOR this proposal.
>
> Michael
>
> On 26/06/13 6:20 PM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
>> I propose that Rule 302, or a Rule formerly having had the number 302
>> (if there is exactly one such rule) be amended to read “Players whose
>> p
Against.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:43 AM, omd wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 26, 2013, Malcolm Ryan wrote:
>>
>> Let's make this interesting.
>>
>> I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
>>
>> "If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its
>> voting period, that pl
I also vote for each of 342-343.
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I vote for 345-347 (think I already voted on 345)
>
> 344 I'll defer to speaker's opinion on ongoing-ness in future.
>
> -Goethe
>
>
I vote for 345-347 (think I already voted on 345)
344 I'll defer to speaker's opinion on ongoing-ness in future.
-Goethe
I vote AGAINST 345 and 346 (what does forfeit mean, and does it prevent
reregistration?)
I vote FOR 344.
Michael
On 26/06/13 10:00 PM, Fool wrote:
> Here I'll just number and repeat the three new proposals that were made.
> You can vote by replying to this message, privately if you like.
> I'll
For all of these.
--
Steve Gardner
via mobile
On 26 Jun 2013 22:03, "Fool" wrote:
>
> [Missed one...]
>
> Here I'll just number and repeat the four new proposals that were made.
> You can vote by replying to this message, privately if you like.
> I'll send out a full report shortly.
>
> -Dan
>
>
On 26 June 2013 13:03, Fool wrote:
>
> [Missed one...]
>
> Here I'll just number and repeat the four new proposals that were made.
> You can vote by replying to this message, privately if you like.
> I'll send out a full report shortly.
>
> -Dan
>
> 344 (Yally):
>>
>> Amend Rule 326 to read:
>>
>>
[Missed one...]
Here I'll just number and repeat the four new proposals that were made.
You can vote by replying to this message, privately if you like.
I'll send out a full report shortly.
-Dan
344 (Yally):
Amend Rule 326 to read:
Each year on June 30th at 00:04:30 UTC +1200 , the game shal
Here I'll just number and repeat the three new proposals that were made.
You can vote by replying to this message, privately if you like.
I'll send out a full report shortly.
-Dan
344 (Yally):
Amend Rule 326 to read:
Each year on June 30th at 00:04:30 UTC +1200 , the game shall end,
and the V
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013, Malcolm Ryan wrote:
> Let's make this interesting.
>
> I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
>
> "If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its
> voting period, that player must immediately forfeit the game."
>
For.
I vote FOR this proposal.
Michael
On 26/06/13 6:20 PM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
> I propose that Rule 302, or a Rule formerly having had the number 302
> (if there is exactly one such rule) be amended to read “Players whose
> proposals are adopted shall receive 10 points.”
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
I vote FOR.
M
On 25/06/2013, at 12:11 AM, Steven Gardner wrote:
> I vote for this Proposal.
>
> On 25 June 2013 00:10, Steven Gardner wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Enact a new Rule which reads:
>
> Within 24 hours of this Rule being enacted, the Speaker shall publish the
>
I vote for this proposal.
--
Steve Gardner
via mobile
On 26 Jun 2013 18:21, "Chuck Carroll" wrote:
> I propose that Rule 302, or a Rule formerly having had the number 302 (if
> there is exactly one such rule) be amended to read “Players whose proposals
> are adopted shall receive 10 points.”
I propose that Rule 302, or a Rule formerly having had the number 302 (if
there is exactly one such rule) be amended to read "Players whose proposals
are adopted shall receive 10 points."
Chuck
Also FOR. -Goethe
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
> FOR
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Malcolm Ryan
> wrote:
> > Let's make this interesting.
> >
> > I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
> >
> > "If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its
> >
FOR
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Malcolm Ryan wrote:
> Let's make this interesting.
>
> I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
>
> "If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its
> voting period, that player must immediately forfeit the game."
>
> M
You youngsters got no guts. In my day we played fer KEEPS.
M
On 26/06/2013, at 1:37 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Malcolm Ryan
> wrote:
>> Let's make this interesting.
>>
>> I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
>>
>> "If a player proposes a rule change wh
Naturally, I vote FOR this.
On 26/06/2013, at 1:33 PM, Malcolm Ryan wrote:
> Let's make this interesting.
>
> I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
>
> "If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its
> voting period, that player must immediately forfeit the game.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Malcolm Ryan wrote:
> Let's make this interesting.
>
> I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
>
> "If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its
> voting period, that player must immediately forfeit the game."
>
> M
Too interesting
Let's make this interesting.
I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
"If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its
voting period, that player must immediately forfeit the game."
M
I disagree. There is no such thing as a "proposal" only a "proposed rule
change". I put it that this is a shorthand way of making 38 proposed rule
changes.
Malcolm
On 23/06/2013, at 12:17 AM, Fool wrote:
> On 22/06/2013 9:45 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> I propose that all rules be transmuted to
FSX is my name for Agora XX. Flameshadowxeroshin is too cumbersome for
most purposes, so I don't use it very much.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Steven Gardner
wrote:
> Either 'Flameshadowxeroshin' or 'FSX' will serve as a name, IMO.
>
> --
> Steve Gardner
> via mobile
>
> On 25 Jun 2013 22:04
I propose that Rule 311, or a rule formerly having had the number 311 (if
there is exactly one such rule) be amended by changing the text defining the
time of the end of the game (such as, but not limited to, "On June 30th,
2013, at 00:04:30 GMT +1200, the game shall end") to "The game shall end
im
Either 'Flameshadowxeroshin' or 'FSX' will serve as a name, IMO.
--
Steve Gardner
via mobile
On 25 Jun 2013 22:04, "Fool" wrote:
> Hi FSX,
> Well, since you're voting for, would it be fair to ask for your name?
>
> -Dan
>
> On 25/06/2013 1:24 AM, Flameshadowxeroshin wrote:
>
>> I vote for this
Hi FSX,
Well, since you're voting for, would it be fair to ask for your name?
-Dan
On 25/06/2013 1:24 AM, Flameshadowxeroshin wrote:
I vote for this proposal.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Steven Gardner
wrote:
I vote for this Proposal.
On 25 June 2013 00:10, Steven Gardner wrote:
I propose that rule 311 be amended by changing the text which reads "the
Voter with the most points shall win. In case of a tie, all such Voters
shall win simultaneously." to "all Voters having a score greater than the
median score among Voters shall win."
Chuck
I vote for this proposal.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Steven Gardner
wrote:
> I vote for this Proposal.
>
>
> On 25 June 2013 00:10, Steven Gardner wrote:
>>
>> I submit the following proposal:
>>
>> Enact a new Rule which reads:
>>
>> Within 24 hours of this Rule being enacted, the Speaker
I vote AGAINST 330.
Michael
On 24/06/13 22:09, Fool wrote:
> Here I just number and repeat the one new proposal. Report shortly.
> -Dan
>
> 330 (Walker):
>> I propose to amend Rule 324 by deleting the first sentence.
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I vote for this Proposal.
On 25 June 2013 00:10, Steven Gardner wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Enact a new Rule which reads:
>
> Within 24 hours of this Rule being enacted, the Speaker shall publish the
> names and email addresses of all registered players of Agora XX.
>
> Steve
>
I submit the following proposal:
Enact a new Rule which reads:
Within 24 hours of this Rule being enacted, the Speaker shall publish the
names and email addresses of all registered players of Agora XX.
Steve
--
Steve Gardner
Research Grants Development
Faculty of Business and Economics
Monash
Here I just number and repeat the one new proposal. Report shortly.
-Dan
330 (Walker):
I propose to amend Rule 324 by deleting the first sentence.
Voting for 324 and 325 closed around 14:30 UTC.
324 (Chuck) passed 4:0 (Walker,Chuck,scshunt,Roujo). It transmutes 110.
Chuck +10 points by 302.
325 (Chuck) fails 2:2 (Chuck,Roujo vs scshunt,Walker).
Full report around 11:00 UTC as usual.
-Dan
I propose that rule 311 be amended by deleting the text "There is no other
way to win."
Chuck
On 22/06/2013 10:01 AM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
I propose the following rule be created:
If at any time four or more Voters have identical non-zero scores, the
Speaker wins the game.
Chuck
This has an interesting interaction with 306... you (among others) could
make me win by announcement.
(
On 22/06/2013 9:45 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
I propose that all rules be transmuted to mutable.
One transmutation per proposal at the moment.
-Dan
I propose the following rule be created:
If at any time four or more Voters have identical non-zero scores, the
Speaker wins the game.
Chuck
I propose that all rules be transmuted to mutable.
I propose that rule 110 be transmuted to mutable.
Chuck
Voting is closed on this. It passes 2:1 (Chuck,Yally vs Walker). This
enacts rule 305. Chuck +10 and Walker +2 by rule 302. Full report in
about 10 hours.
Voting on 306-309 is still open. Vote early, vote often!
-Dan
305 (Chuck):
I propose that the following rule be created:
No rule may
I propose that Rule 110 be transmuted to mutable.
omd, I will vote for the transmutation of 112 if you will vote for the
transmutation of 110.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of omd
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 201
omd made two proposals in a message sent at 10:00 p.m. EDT on June 19.
Chuck
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of Aaron Goldfein
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 12:58 AM
To: Fool; Agora Nomic discussions (DF)
Subject: Re: DIS: Agora XX
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Fool wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Here I'll only number and repeat the one proposal made that hasn't yet
> been numbered. You can vote by just replying to this message, privately if
> you like.
>
> Voting on this closes in 24h.
>
> -Dan
>
> 305 (Chuck):
>
>> I propose
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Fool wrote:
> 305 (Chuck):
>>
>> I propose that the following rule be created:
>>
>> No rule may award or penalize players based on their votes on proposals
>> whose voting period ended before or at the same time as the time at which
>> the current form of said rul
Hello all,
Here I'll only number and repeat the one proposal made that hasn't yet
been numbered. You can vote by just replying to this message, privately
if you like.
Voting on this closes in 24h.
-Dan
305 (Chuck):
I propose that the following rule be created:
No rule may award or penaliz
I propose that the following rule be created:
No rule may award or penalize players based on their votes on proposals
whose voting period ended before or at the same time as the time at which
the current form of said rule took effect.
Chuck
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:17 AM, wrote:
> I vote in favor of my own proposal.
I propose that a rule be enacted to read:
"Upon the enactment of this rule, each player who voted for it shall
receive 30 points, and each player who voted against shall lose the 10
points they gained for voting agai
I vote in favor.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:19 PM, wrote:
> I propose that Rule 110 be transmuted to mutable.
>
> Chuck
>
>
I vote in favor of my own proposal.
Chuck
> I propose that Rule 211 be amended to read:
>
>
>
> "Voters who voted against proposals which are adopted receive 2 points
> apiece. Players whose proposals are adopted shall receive a random number
> of
> points in the range 1-10 inclusive."
>
>
>
> C
I propose that Rule 110 be transmuted to mutable.
Chuck
I vote in favor.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 18 Jun 2013, at 13:08, "Chuck Carroll" wrote:
>
> I propose that Rule 211 be amended to read:
>
>
>
> “Voters who voted against proposals which are adopted receive 2 points
> apiece. Players whose proposals are adopted
On 18 Jun 2013, at 13:08, "Chuck Carroll" wrote:
> I propose that Rule 211 be amended to read:
>
> “Voters who voted against proposals which are adopted receive 2 points
> apiece. Players whose proposals are adopted shall receive a random number of
> points in the range 1-10 inclusive.”
>
>
I propose that Rule 211 be amended to read:
"Voters who voted against proposals which are adopted receive 2 points
apiece. Players whose proposals are adopted shall receive a random number of
points in the range 1-10 inclusive."
Chuck
60 matches
Mail list logo
