Re: DIS: Brief count

2014-10-20 Thread omd
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > They said it was tactical. The only vote that makes tactical sense is > for them to vote against yours working, and for theirs working, that > implicitly recognizes the 4-days argument (that's the only outcome on > the table that leads to that

Re: DIS: Brief count

2014-10-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Eritivus wrote: > Note: I do intend to submit a(n expanded) Brief, by 07:00 UTC Tuesday > (midnight tonight PDT), perhaps earlier. I did some related grunt work > last night (collecting and reviewing all relevant contemporary messages, > and more mostly -- but not totally --

Re: DIS: Brief count

2014-10-20 Thread Eritivus
Note: I do intend to submit a(n expanded) Brief, by 07:00 UTC Tuesday (midnight tonight PDT), perhaps earlier. I did some related grunt work last night (collecting and reviewing all relevant contemporary messages, and more mostly -- but not totally -- fruitless CFJ searching). I 'just' need to poli

Re: DIS: Brief count

2014-10-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, omd wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:12 PM, omd wrote: > >> ais523: FALSE (tactical, but assumes process works after 4 days). > >> Sprocklem : FALSE (tactical, but assumes process works after 4 days). > > Also, I don't think either of these briefs implies anythi

Re: DIS: Brief count

2014-10-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, omd wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > G.: FALSE (process of review is broken). > > Eritivus : "FALSE" (rule in question doesn't allow rule changes). > > ais523: FALSE (tactical, but assumes process works after 4 days). > > S

Re: DIS: Brief count

2014-10-20 Thread omd
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:12 PM, omd wrote: >> ais523: FALSE (tactical, but assumes process works after 4 days). >> Sprocklem : FALSE (tactical, but assumes process works after 4 days). Also, I don't think either of these briefs implies anything about things working, as opposed to gener

Re: DIS: Brief count

2014-10-20 Thread omd
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > G.: FALSE (process of review is broken). > Eritivus : "FALSE" (rule in question doesn't allow rule changes). > ais523: FALSE (tactical, but assumes process works after 4 days). > Sprocklem : FALSE (tactical, but assumes p

DIS: Brief count

2014-10-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
Briefs right now I have: G.: FALSE (process of review is broken). Eritivus : "FALSE" (rule in question doesn't allow rule changes). ais523: FALSE (tactical, but assumes process works after 4 days). Sprocklem : FALSE (tactical, but assumes process works after 4 days). omd