On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 6:28 PM Ørjan Johansen via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> >>> 1. e, acting as emself, has publicly stated, and not subsequently
> >>> publicly withdrawn eir statement, that e agrees to the action;
> >>
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
1. e, acting as emself, has publicly stated, and not subsequently
publicly withdrawn eir statement, that e agrees to the action;
That last comma looks out of place.
Looks right to me, based on my intuitive comma placement
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 4:16 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> First of all, I haven’t looked through all of the original thread, so let me
> know if something’s already been discussed to death. I’m aware that I’m
> suggesting some big changes late in the game, and I’m not *that*
First of all, I haven’t looked through all of the original thread, so let me
know if something’s already been discussed to death. I’m aware that I’m
suggesting some big changes late in the game, and I’m not *that* unhappy with
the proposal as it stands, so I would probably vote FOR even as it
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 2:42 PM AIS523--- via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 14:31 -0800, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > I think this addresses everyone's concerns. Comments are welcome.
> [snip]
> > Amend Rule 2519, "Consent", to read in full:
> > A person is
On 1/8/20 5:42 PM, AIS523--- via agora-discussion wrote:
> I have an automatic uneasy reaction to anything that inherently needs
> to be able to platonically evaluate arbitrary conditions that can be
> specified without going through a proposal process or the like,
> especially if there are no
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 14:31 -0800, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I think this addresses everyone's concerns. Comments are welcome.
[snip]
> Amend Rule 2519, "Consent", to read in full:
> A person is deemed to have consented to an action if and only if:
>
> 1. e, acting as
I think this addresses everyone's concerns. Comments are welcome.
-Aris
---
Title: Contract Patency v2
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-authors: Jason Cobb, Falsifian
Amend Rule 2519, "Consent", to read in full:
A person is deemed to have consented to an action if and only if:
1. e,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 6:35 PM James Cook wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 06:11, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
> > Here's a draft that separates out contracts from pacts, and creates an
> > office of Notary to track contracts and pledges. NOTE: Volunteers are
> > needed for Notary! Apply now!
>
> I
On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 02:35, James Cook wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 06:11, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
> > Here's a draft that separates out contracts from pacts, and creates an
> > office of Notary to track contracts and pledges. NOTE: Volunteers are
> > needed for Notary! Apply now!
>
> I
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 06:11, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Here's a draft that separates out contracts from pacts, and creates an
> office of Notary to track contracts and pledges. NOTE: Volunteers are
> needed for Notary! Apply now!
I really like the idea of tracking pledges and contracts. A few
> > Should this be "A pledge or pact is invisible"? Also, is it really
> > possible for a pledge to be invisible, since a pledge must be made
> > publicly per R2450?
>
> No, it shouldn’t. Pacts can be made privately, even under the new rules. It
> would be irrational to subject old pacts to
On 11/11/19 2:38 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Alright, a couple scams here.
1) Publish multiple documents, each with the header "this might be the
text/parties list of a contract:"; that way there's still some degree of
uncertainty.
I hadn’t thought of that. Do you have any ideas about how to
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 6:37 AM Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 11/11/19 1:10 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > --
> > Title: Contract Patency
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: Aris
> > Co-authors:
> >
> >
> > Amend Rule 2519, "Consent", to read in full:
> >A person is deemed to have consented to an
On 11/11/19 1:10 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
--
Title: Contract Patency
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-authors:
Amend Rule 2519, "Consent", to read in full:
A person is deemed to have consented to an action if and only if:
1. e, acting as emself, has publicly stated, and not
Here's a draft that separates out contracts from pacts, and creates an
office of Notary to track contracts and pledges. NOTE: Volunteers are
needed for Notary! Apply now!
Changes:
- Fiddles around a bit with the definition of consent, allowing
consent by contract and without objection (if the
16 matches
Mail list logo
