Re: DIS: Experimental Ruleset Restructuring

On 05/20/2017 09:46 PM, Josh T wrote: I do not like how it is not evident what the numbers after a rule are (rule number, power). Quickly scanning I mistook the second number for revision number, which appears to be missing. This is the central issue for me as well. Revision #s need to be

Re: DIS: Experimental Ruleset Restructuring

On Sat, 20 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: > I’ve experimentally restructured the categories in the Ruleset in an attempt > to make it easier to find rules–feedback on the new > categories? https://agoranomic.github.io/ruleset/ > Gaelan Really nice! I really like the concept of reusable definit

Re: DIS: Experimental Ruleset Restructuring

I do not like how it is not evident what the numbers after a rule are (rule number, power). Quickly scanning I mistook the second number for revision number, which appears to be missing. 天火狐 On 20 May 2017 at 22:42, Alex Smith wrote: > On Sat, 2017-05-20 at 19:30 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote: > >

Re: DIS: Experimental Ruleset Restructuring

On Sat, 2017-05-20 at 19:30 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote: > I’ve experimentally restructured the categories in the Ruleset in an > attempt to make it easier to find rules–feedback on the new > categories? https://agoranomic.github.io/ruleset/ > Oh, one fix tha

Re: DIS: Experimental Ruleset Restructuring

On Sat, 2017-05-20 at 19:30 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote: > I’ve experimentally restructured the categories in the Ruleset in an > attempt to make it easier to find rules–feedback on the new > categories? https://agoranomic.github.io/ruleset/ > I really like p

DIS: Experimental Ruleset Restructuring

I’ve experimentally restructured the categories in the Ruleset in an attempt to make it easier to find rules–feedback on the new categories? https://agoranomic.github.io/ruleset/ Gaelan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature