i don't see why you're sanctioning the challenger 1 strike when they make a
successful challenge.
Oh never mind, the "proposed valid rule that would work" is a "possible
next play" not an amendment to the challenged rule, which is how I misread
it, which misreading persisted long enough to begin
Same here. This will be neat.
On 6/30/2018 11:18 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
I'm really looking forward to this and see no issues with the regs.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:27 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
[Second draft. Now as pure tournament regs not contract. Added a
few bits,
I'm really looking forward to this and see no issues with the regs.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:27 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> [Second draft. Now as pure tournament regs not contract. Added a
> few bits, and slowed the game down].
>
> FANTASY RULES CONTRACT PROTO.
>
> 0. G. CANNOT win this
[Second draft. Now as pure tournament regs not contract. Added a
few bits, and slowed the game down].
FANTASY RULES CONTRACT PROTO.
0. G. CANNOT win this Tournament or become a Contestant. G. is the
Judge (gamemaster) of this game.
1. For 4 days after the contest begins, any
4 matches
Mail list logo
