Re: DIS: Proto: Banking and Bonds (v2)

2017-09-23 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Given my removal of the First Bank of Agora rule, I am adding the following text to the Central Bank rule. However, I think it will be controversial, so I am posting it here for specific comment before my next draft: The Banker of the Central Bank CAN transfer shinies from the Central Bank to

Re: DIS: Proto: Banking and Bonds (v2)

2017-09-23 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Thanks for the feedback. I am going to respond line by line below. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 22, 2017, at 11:33 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > I normally try to avoid this, because it’s an invitation to line-by-line > wrangling, but I have

Re: DIS: Proto: Banking and Bonds (v2)

2017-09-22 Thread Owen Jacobson
I normally try to avoid this, because it’s an invitation to line-by-line wrangling, but I have some fairly specific feedback on wording. Before I get into it, some comments on the overall structure: It’s good. In particular, I appreciate the possibility of multiple banks, though I suspect we’ll

Re: DIS: Proto: Banking and Bonds (v2)

2017-09-21 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
When I submit this proposal, they will be removed. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 21, 2017, at 2:50 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > I have trouble with the plusses and minuses. It means that I'm not > allowed to wrap lines in my promotor repor

Re: DIS: Proto: Banking and Bonds (v2)

2017-09-21 Thread Aris Merchant
I have trouble with the plusses and minuses. It means that I'm not allowed to wrap lines in my promotor report, something I usually do on a fairly regular basis. -Aris On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > In response to feedback, here is the new banking propo

DIS: Proto: Banking and Bonds (v2)

2017-09-21 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
In response to feedback, here is the new banking proposal, if I don't get negative feedback, I plan to pend it this week: { All "+" and "-" symbols in the body of this proposal should be ignored and shall have no effect on the ruleset or game state. Replace the following line in "Assets": - res