On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:06 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 18:52, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > My gut feeling is that this is a bit overcomplicated. There are too
> > many categories. Additionally, I
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 18:52, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> My gut feeling is that this is a bit overcomplicated. There are too
> many categories. Additionally, I dislike this sort of pragmatization.
> The generally platonic model has served Agora
My gut feeling is that this is a bit overcomplicated. There are too
many categories. Additionally, I dislike this sort of pragmatization.
The generally platonic model has served Agora well the vast majority
of the time. I don't have extended reasoning here, those are just my
initial reactions.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 14:14, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Here's some outline I was thinking to move us towards a more pragmatic
> model of law:
>
Any opinions? Buehler?
Agora
Here's some outline I was thinking to move us towards a more pragmatic
model of law:
Any question that arises as part of a dispute can be categorized into one
of the following:
- Question of fact, divided into:
- Questions of natural fact, being facts which are true without reference
to the
5 matches
Mail list logo
