Re: DIS: R2136(b)

On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 19:52 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > Except that R2198 takes precedence over it. Given the current precedence garble, double oh dear. Does the taking precedence even work in the current ruleset? Do the rules in question even exist? -- ais523

Re: DIS: R2136(b)

Ed Murphy wrote: > coppro wrote: > >> H. Scorekeepor, when sorting out the madness, please note that R2136(b) >> still applies, meaning that a lot of the things that have been >> purportedly done wrt the new contests are patently INVALID. > > Except that R2198 takes precedence over it. > wonderf

Re: DIS: R2136(b)

coppro wrote: > H. Scorekeepor, when sorting out the madness, please note that R2136(b) > still applies, meaning that a lot of the things that have been > purportedly done wrt the new contests are patently INVALID. Except that R2198 takes precedence over it.

DIS: R2136(b)

H. Scorekeepor, when sorting out the madness, please note that R2136(b) still applies, meaning that a lot of the things that have been purportedly done wrt the new contests are patently INVALID.