ehird wrote:
> I rename Teh Cltohed Mna to ehrid.
I don't know if this was effective (contrast "Teh Cltohed Mna changes
its name to ehrid" / "I act on behalf of Teh Cltohed Mna to change its
name to ehrid"). In any case, it seems reasonable to treat "ehrid" as
unambiguously referring to this con
2008/6/25 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why isn't it a person?
>>
> In order to be a partnership it must devolve its legal obligations
> onto a subset of its parties numbering at least two. Presently it only
> devolves its
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why isn't it a person?
>
In order to be a partnership it must devolve its legal obligations
onto a subset of its parties numbering at least two. Presently it only
devolves its legal obligations onto ehird.
BobTHJ
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Ben Caplan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 25 June 2008 11:36:02 Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Elliott Hird
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > I chan
2008/6/25 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You would threaten the Godfather? I submit the following:
>
> Sell Ticket
> Cost: 5VP
> Action: not object to the termination of the pledge that permits
> players to act on behalf of ehird
>
> BobTHJ
>
Nice try.
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 11:36:02 Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I change the Manroster to ehird.
> > I rename Teh Cltohed Mna to ehrid.
> >
>
> Since it is no longer a person and has never been a first-class
> person, I cause
2008/6/25 Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I tried arguing this one with ehird (the first-class person) privately
> earlier; eir argument was that the contract still devolved its obligations
> onto Ivan Hope CXXVII even though e had no way of causing it to fulfil
> them. I'm not sure if this
BobTHJ wrote:
> Since it is no longer a person and has never been a first-class
> person, I cause the contract formerly known as Teh Cltohed Mna and now
> known as ehird to deregister per R869.
I tried arguing this one with ehird (the first-class person) privately
earlier; eir argument was that the
8 matches
Mail list logo
