Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Ed Murphy
Quazie wrote: > Evidence: this thread I'm not using Gmail. Please quote evidence directly. (Fortunately, in this case, you did.)

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread comex
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.dsm.fordham.edu/~grossman/asciiwar.html Hmm...

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Quazie
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:03 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:01 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That said, I wish I could have had some more inventive ASCII art (i.e. a picture o

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread comex
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:01 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> That said, I wish I could have had some more inventive ASCII art (i.e. >>> a picture of Phoenix Wright) but I do not know of any such pictures. >> >> http://

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Quazie
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:01 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> comex wrote: >> >>> That said, I wish I could have had some more inventive ASCII art (i.e. >>> a picture of Phoenix Wright) but I do not know of any such pict

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread comex
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > comex wrote: > >> That said, I wish I could have had some more inventive ASCII art (i.e. >> a picture of Phoenix Wright) but I do not know of any such pictures. > > http://www.pizzinini.net/projects/pic2ascii/ Ew, Visual Basic

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: > That said, I wish I could have had some more inventive ASCII art (i.e. > a picture of Phoenix Wright) but I do not know of any such pictures. http://www.pizzinini.net/projects/pic2ascii/

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread comex
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> More further gratuitous: no-one's complained about lack of fixed-width >> fonts in reading tables like voting reports, which would be Harder. -G.

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Quazie
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Gratuitous: In Gmail which doesn't easily do fixed width font, it >>> doesn't look like a word to me. >

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread comex
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > More further gratuitous: no-one's complained about lack of fixed-width > fonts in reading tables like voting reports, which would be Harder. -G. I concur: although I am accustomed to having to click Show Original to view m

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > More further gratuitous: no-one's complained about lack of fixed-width > fonts in reading tables like voting reports, which would be Harder. -G. I know at a glance that a voting report is a voting report. At a glance, thi

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Gratuitous: In Gmail which doesn't easily do fixed width font, it >> doesn't look like a word to me. > > Further gratuitous: 16 of 22 first-class players were using Gmail as > of the

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Ian Kelly
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gratuitous: In Gmail which doesn't easily do fixed width font, it > doesn't look like a word to me. Turn on the Gmail Labs "Fixed width font" feature. It enables a "Show in fixed width font" action which is much more convenient

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Taral
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gratuitous: In Gmail which doesn't easily do fixed width font, it > doesn't look like a word to me. Gratuitous: I consider "Show Original" to be pretty easy. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any furt

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gratuitous: In Gmail which doesn't easily do fixed width font, it > doesn't look like a word to me. Further gratuitous: 16 of 22 first-class players were using Gmail as of the last registrar's report.

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Quazie wrote: >> That's like questioning a message on the basis of not knowing what >> font an email reader will render it in. Gratuitous: was perfectly >> clear to me! -G. > Gratuitous: In Gmail which doesn't easily do fixed width font, it > doesn't look like a word to me.

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Quazie wrote: >> ___ _ _ _ ___ ___ _ _ _ >> / _ \| __ )| | / ___|_ _|_ _/ _ \| \ | | | >> | | | | _ \ _ | | _|| | | | | | | | | \| | | >> | |_| | |_) | |_| | |__| |___ | | | | |_| | |\ |_| >> \___/|/ \___/|_\| |_|

Re: BUS: RE: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread comex
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I CFJ on the following statement: Comex objected to the termination of > the pledge which allows anything to act on behalf of ehird. > Evidence: this thread Evidence: I once joined a contest (don't remember which one) in this man

Re: DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/6/25 Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > How? I can attempt to terminate it without objection if you like, > but someone might object. > -- > ais523 > Er, that'd be nice. ehird

DIS: RE: meh

2008-06-25 Thread Alexander Smith
ehird wrote: > I leave the pledge that talks about things being able to perform > actions on my behalf. How? I can attempt to terminate it without objection if you like, but someone might object. -- ais523 <>