oh, crud.  I copy and pasted and forgot to change "grok" to "ATMunn".

There's actually a couple precedents that the assignment in the message
worked, not the subject line.  So I guess these are "linked" with grok as
judge (unless e recuses emself from one).  Sorry about that!

On 6/25/2020 3:24 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 
> The below is CFJ 3858.  I assign it to grok.
> 
> CFJ Statement:
> An action to be performed with 7 days notice depends on objections.
> 
> 
> Called by:
> Jason on 23 Jun 2020 21:58:23 -0400
> (Barred: nch)
> 
> 
> Caller's Evidence:
> 
> Rule 2124/26 [Excerpt]:
> 
>>       The above notwithstanding, if an action depends on objections, and
>>       an objection to an intent to perform it has been withdrawn within
>>       the past 24 hours, then Agora is not Satisfied with that intent.
>>       
>>       The above notwithstanding, Agora is not satisfied with an intent
>>       if the Speaker has objected to it in the last 48 hours.
> 
> 
> Dictionary definition of "define":
> 
> [0]: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/depend
> 
> 
> Caller's Arguments:
> 
> What it means for an action to "depend on objections" is not defined in
> the rules. This means that it has its common language meaning. The word
> at issue is "depend". Merriam-Webster [0] defines "depend" as an
> intransitive verb meaning:
> 
> 1. to be determined, based, or contingent
> 
> 2. to be pending or undecided
> 
> 3. a. to place reliance or trust
> 
>    b. to be dependent especially for financial support
> 
> 4. to hang down
> 
> I believe definition 1 here makes the most sense in context. I see two
> ways to interpret an action "depending on objections" - it either must
> require objects to be performable, or it must be affected by objections.
> The former makes no sense - no dependent action requires objections in
> order to be actionable, which would mean the clause has no effect. This
> leaves the second reading - the action "depends on objections" if
> objections affect whether it can be performed.
> 
> An action to be performed with 7 days notice is affected by the presence
> or absence of objections. In particular, it is affected by the presence
> of an objection from the Speaker, who can veto an action for 48 hours by
> objecting. This is consistent with a common language reading - the
> effectiveness of an action to be performed with 7 days action is, in
> part, "determined" by, "based" on, or "contingent" upon, the presence or
> absence of an objection. Because of this, I argue that an action to be
> performed with 7 days notice "depends on objections" and argue for TRUE.
> 
> 

Reply via email to