On 7/2/20 4:21 AM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
> Arguments:
>
> at 12:43 AM, Becca Lee via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
>> I clearly meant that i transfer the cards nch had, "those cards" into
>> products in 4 sets of 4. obviously i did not mean that 18 is 4x4.
> Your rephrased version is still
On 7/1/20 11:43 PM, omd via agora-business wrote:
> at 7:26 AM, Becca Lee via agora-business
> [](mailto:agora-busin...@agoranomic.org)
> wrote:
>
>> {Acting on behalf of nch, I resolve one of eir intents to deregister R.
>> Lee. I register. I award myself a welcome package. I transfer a victory
>
the fact that you were mathematically confused by "4 sets of 4" doesn't
really mean that it's confusing
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:52 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> Reading it initially, I was a bit confused by how the math worked out and
> I do think it could ha
Reading it initially, I was a bit confused by how the math worked out and I do
think it could have been sufficiently ambiguous to cause it to fail.
> On Jul 2, 2020, at 08:34, Becca Lee via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> It's obvious what you meant, at least given enough context. It’s
> It's obvious what you meant, at least given enough context. It’s not at
>all obvious to me that what you said is close enough to what you meant.
But if what I said is "obvious", and all the context you have is the actual
words I used in the message, what i said automatically clearly conveys wha
> > I repeat the above actions in braces so that they happen 16 times total.
> > Nch has 18 victory cards and 18 justice cards.
> >
> > I act on nch’s behalf to pay those victory and justice cards into
> products
> > in 4 sets of 4 so that e has 40 victory points and 40 Blot-B-Gones.
"those cards"
Arguments:
at 12:43 AM, Becca Lee via agora-discussion
wrote:
I clearly meant that i transfer the cards nch had, "those cards" into
products in 4 sets of 4. obviously i did not mean that 18 is 4x4.
Your rephrased version is still self-contradictory to my ears. You didn’t
say that you t
this is so extremely obvious that you calling a CFJ on it is actually
harmful to gameplay.
Also regarding the what is clearly thing, see these CFJs (this is a copiedm
essage from discord, putting ito n list.
3667 found that non-quotes buried in quotes worked. 3676 found that putting
it actually *
I clearly meant that i transfer the cards nch had, "those cards" into
products in 4 sets of 4. obviously i did not mean that 18 is 4x4.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:44 PM omd via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> at 7:26 AM, Becca Lee via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> > {Acting
9 matches
Mail list logo
