On Sunday 25 November 2007 20:19:14 Ed Murphy wrote:
> pikhq wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 25 November 2007 17:07:15 Ed Murphy wrote:
>
> >> I also feel obliged to point out that I object to the repeal of
> >> monthly decay. (I proposed monthly decay in the first place, to
> >> prod Zefram to stop hoar
pikhq wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007 17:07:15 Ed Murphy wrote:
I also feel obliged to point out that I object to the repeal of
monthly decay. (I proposed monthly decay in the first place, to
prod Zefram to stop hoarding.)
I was introducing the harder VVLOP changes to *try* and reduce t
On Sunday 25 November 2007 17:07:15 Ed Murphy wrote:
> pikhq wrote (in the Agora's Child forum):
>
> > I retract "No decay!", and submit the following proposal (also titled "No
> > decay!"):
> > Adoption index = 2
> > Interest index = 2
> > Co-author is avpx
> > In rule 2126:
> >* Remove mont
pikhq wrote (in the Agora's Child forum):
I retract "No decay!", and submit the following proposal (also titled "No
decay!"):
Adoption index = 2
Interest index = 2
Co-author is avpx
In rule 2126:
* Remove monthly decay
* Change "N+1 to increase another player's VVLOP by N"
to "N
4 matches
Mail list logo
