Should clarify that this doesn’t include year. Like the idea.
Gaelan
> On Nov 9, 2018, at 7:02 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> it is
> the exact date e did so
The word players is is plural, the word eir is singular.
-Aris
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 7:02 PM Reuben Staley
wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> -
> Title: Happy Birthday To You
> Author: Trigon
> Coauthors:
> AI: 1
>
> Enact a new rule entitled "Birthday Gifts", power=1, with the
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 2:41 AM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> * Having a Thesis pass peer-review and be granted a Degree based
> on its merit: 20 shinies
Apparently we call these "coins" now.
-twg
Invariably, I have made a mistake in the following proposal. So I'm
asking for contributions before submitting it.
-
Title: Reinstituting Rewards
AI: 1
Author: Trigon
Coauthors:
[ COMMENT: For those of you who know that I really liked the rewards
system from last year, this shouldn't
Once again, Ørjan is correct. I retract my most recently submitted
proposal and submit the following one:
-
Title: High-level asset verbs
AI: 3
Author: Trigon
Coauthors:
[ COMMENT: This terminology is ripped from the coins rule and applies to
all assets. I really like this one. ]
Amend
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote:
Is this really what you want?
Gaelan
On Nov 1, 2018, at 3:37 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
2. For each office, if a single player held that office for 16 or
more days in the previous month and no unforgivable fines were
levied on em for
Is this really what you want?
Gaelan
> On Nov 1, 2018, at 3:37 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> 2. For each office, if a single player held that office for 16 or
> more days in the previous month and no unforgivable fines were
> levied on em for eir conduct in that office during
Retracting doesn't un-pend it, it removes it from the proposal pool. See
rule 2350, the last paragraph:
"The author of a proposal in the Proposal Pool CAN remove (syn. retract,
withdraw) it from the Pool by announcement."
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018, 00:17 Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Pending’s gone, so can
Pending’s gone, so can you retract?
Gaelan
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 10:41 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> Right you are, Ørjan. I retract the two proposals I have most recently
> submitted and instead submit the following two:
>
> -
> Title: Only proposals should be distributed
> AI: 1
>
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
Repeal Rule 2505 "Distributing Assets".
That should be 2515.
Amend Rule 1728 "Dependent Actions" by:
replacing the following:
2. If the action is to be performed Without N Objections, With N
Agoran Consent, or With Notice, if the
10 matches
Mail list logo
