Oh Lordy. POSSIBLE is a requirement for the following:
2154/53 - SHALL requirement to end unresolved elections
2160/20 - Deputization
2466/1 - Acting on behalf
2574/3 - SHALL requirement to resolve zombie-maintainance intents
Luckily, I think that POSSIBLE is obvious enough that it works even without a
definition, so I don’t think this is a full-on “the rules haven’t been working”
crisis.
Gaelan
> On Oct 6, 2019, at 7:52 PM, Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal (sorry, I know this is after the draft):
>
>
> Title: Anything is POSSIBLE
>
> AI: 3
>
> Text:
>
> {
>
> Amend Rule 2152 ("Mother, May I?") by replacing the text "CAN:" with the text
> "CAN, POSSIBLE:".
>
> ["POSSIBLE" is used in the Rules right now, but is never defined; this
> defines it.]
>
> }
>
>
> --
> Jason Cobb
>
