On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:53 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I think it would only be fair to trade 2 of our rules for 2 of their
>>> rules. Or 1 rule and a pick in next year's Rule Draft.
>>
>> Just as long as we don't end up with the Beast.
>
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:53 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think it would only be fair to trade 2 of our rules for 2 of their
>> rules. Or 1 rule and a pick in next year's Rule Draft.
>
> Just as long as we don't end up with the Beast.
Except for its ability to Devour random rules, th
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is this the first (attempted) transfer of rule text between email nomics?
>> Seems like a momentous occasion.
There was a FRC game where all rules had
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>>I submit a proposal, with the title "Export",
>
> Is this the first (attempted) transfer of rule text between email nomics?
> Seems like a momentous occasion.
I think it would only be fair to trade 2 of our rules
ais523 wrote:
>I submit a proposal, with the title "Export",
Is this the first (attempted) transfer of rule text between email nomics?
Seems like a momentous occasion.
-zefram
5 matches
Mail list logo