Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [s-b]: Export

2008-10-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:53 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I think it would only be fair to trade 2 of our rules for 2 of their >>> rules. Or 1 rule and a pick in next year's Rule Draft. >> >> Just as long as we don't end up with the Beast. >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [s-b]: Export

2008-10-09 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:53 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think it would only be fair to trade 2 of our rules for 2 of their >> rules. Or 1 rule and a pick in next year's Rule Draft. > > Just as long as we don't end up with the Beast. Except for its ability to Devour random rules, th

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [s-b]: Export

2008-10-09 Thread comex
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is this the first (attempted) transfer of rule text between email nomics? >> Seems like a momentous occasion. There was a FRC game where all rules had

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [s-b]: Export

2008-10-09 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ais523 wrote: >>I submit a proposal, with the title "Export", > > Is this the first (attempted) transfer of rule text between email nomics? > Seems like a momentous occasion. I think it would only be fair to trade 2 of our rules

DIS: Re: BUS: [s-b]: Export

2008-10-09 Thread Zefram
ais523 wrote: >I submit a proposal, with the title "Export", Is this the first (attempted) transfer of rule text between email nomics? Seems like a momentous occasion. -zefram