On Sunday 13 July 2008 10:22:27 am comex wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Ben Caplan
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 July 2008 10:05:36 pm Ben Caplan wrote:
> >> [More rotation.]
> >
> > Comments?
>
> Seems like a lot of work for the Disc Jockey.
Probably.
Note, though
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 12 July 2008 10:05:36 pm Ben Caplan wrote:
>> [More rotation.]
>
> Comments?
Seems like a lot of work for the Disc Jockey.
On Saturday 12 July 2008 10:05:36 pm Ben Caplan wrote:
> [More rotation.]
Comments?
On Sunday 13 July 2008 10:00:48 am Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> The Airstrip One contract is giving contract-defined props to
> players who are not parties to the contract. Is this a good idea?
> Is this permissible?
I don't see that it's fundamentally different from pens or chits.
The Airstrip One contract is giving contract-defined props to players
who are not parties to the contract. Is this a good idea? Is this
permissible?
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Saturday 12 July 2008 09:01:10 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
> a) Props are a currency. The recordkeepor of props is the
> ATC. Ownership of props is limited to first-class
> players. Props CANNOT be created, transferred, or destroyed
> except as required by this contract o
6 matches
Mail list logo
