Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A growing ruleset

2015-08-23 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015, Tanner Swett wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: Root = own parent was on purpose.  Not sure if that screws up any tree math assumptions, but I didn't see any harm in making it so.  Well, it screws up the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A growing ruleset

2015-08-22 Thread Tanner Swett
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: Root = own parent was on purpose. Not sure if that screws up any tree math assumptions, but I didn't see any harm in making it so. Well, it screws up the fact that no node is its own ancestor. Actually, I think every

DIS: Re: BUS: A growing ruleset

2015-08-21 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: Create the following Rule, The Olive Tree, Power=1: Every existing Rule (every Child) has an existing Rule as a Parent. The lowest numbered existing Rule is the Root. The default parent for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A growing ruleset

2015-08-21 Thread omd
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote: Otherwise the Root is its own Parent. Makes sense if you envision it as a Unix filesystem.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A growing ruleset

2015-08-21 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, omd wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote: Otherwise the Root is its own Parent. Makes sense if you envision it as a Unix filesystem. Root = own parent was on purpose. Not sure if that screws up any tree math