Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A meta-CFJ

2012-01-10 Thread Arkady English
On 9 January 2012 23:59, Ben Schultz wrote: > > Gratuitous counter argument, possibly erroneous: > > I seem to recall that Agoran precedent allows non-players to submit CFJs > without affecting their player (or non-player) status. > > OscarMeyr > I think this is not so much "Agoran precedent" as

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A meta-CFJ

2012-01-09 Thread Ben Schultz
Gratuitous counter argument, possibly erroneous: I seem to recall that Agoran precedent allows non-players to submit CFJs without affecting their player (or non-player) status. OscarMeyr

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A meta-CFJ

2012-01-08 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Craig Daniel wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > The "might reasonably" makes this so squishy as to be trivially true; > > all we have to show is that there is at least one cfj that might be > > interpreted this way, and I think we've got at le

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A meta-CFJ

2012-01-08 Thread Craig Daniel
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > The "might reasonably" makes this so squishy as to be trivially true; > all we have to show is that there is at least one cfj that might be > interpreted this way, and I think we've got at least one in the > database.  -G. > So it does. It's

DIS: Re: BUS: A meta-CFJ

2012-01-08 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Craig Daniel wrote: > I submit the following CFJ: > > {{Submitting a CFJ on one's own playerhood might reasonably be > interpreted as a request to join this game.}} > > Arguments: recent Agoran custom favors very unusual join requests. The "might reasonably" makes this so s