Next time, read the contract before alleging someone misread it.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 29, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Roger Hicks
wrote:
If you're not convinced I'm handling this right take a look at your
latest harvestings of proposals for po
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:29, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Care to explain?
>>
>> BobTHJ
>>
>
> I explained with my last CoE but I just realized I only CoEd my
> holdings, not everyone. You recorded events as if the mere act of
> harvesting or buying
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 08:29 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> > Care to explain?
> >
> > BobTHJ
> >
>
> I explained with my last CoE but I just realized I only CoEd my
> holdings, not everyone. You recorded events as if the mere act of
> harvesting or
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 21:49, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>>
>> Reflects actions up to and including Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:50
>>
>> Agoran Agricultural Association
>
> CoE: This whole report is inaccurate as it purports actions that were never
> performed.
>
Care to explain?
BobTHJ
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 15:13, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
coppro 2 12 0 20 12 17 12 21 24 22 0 14
CoE: AAA actions are not, and to my knowledge have never been, platonic.
-coppro
I mill 9 - 7 = 2, 9 - 7
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 15:13, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> coppro 2 12 0 20 12 17 12 21 24 22 0 14
>>
>> CoE: AAA actions are not, and to my knowledge have never been, platonic.
>>
>> -coppro
>>
>
> I mill 9 - 7 = 2, 9 - 7 =
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 14:02, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 13:58, Sean Hunt wrote:
coppro 2 12 0 20 12 17 12 21 24 22 0 14
>>>
>>> CoE: AAA actions are not, and to my knowledge have never been, p
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 13:58, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> coppro 2 12 0 20 12 17 12 21 24 22 0 14
>>
>> CoE: AAA actions are not, and to my knowledge have never been, platonic.
>>
> I'm not understanding the nature of your
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 13:58, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> coppro 2 12 0 20 12 17 12 21 24 22 0 14
>
> CoE: AAA actions are not, and to my knowledge have never been, platonic.
>
I'm not understanding the nature of your CoE, can you clarify?
BobTHJ
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 09:01 +0100, ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 16:49 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> > CROP & WRV HOLDINGS
> > Farmer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
> > -
> > ais523 11 18
On 8/23/09 2:48 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
[snip]
> I harvest 2663, 2664 (recent CFJ numbers) for 4 WRV.
These harvests failed because I harvested those CFJ numbers earlier in
the week (and apparently didn't remember that I did this).
- woggle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 00:04, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 21:41, comex wrote:
>> Proto-Denied. It seemed reasonably clear to me since the IBA is the
>> only active bank. Other opinions?
>>
> Bank transactions are difficult in this regard
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 00:04, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 21:41, comex wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> IBA 3 2 0 0 1 1 9 1 1 8 9 1
>>
>> CoE: The IBA has no WRV. coppro did not specify which bank e intended
>
Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 21:41, comex wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> IBA � � � � � � � � 3 � 2 � 0 � 0 � 1 � 1 � 9 � 1 � 1 � 8 � 9 � 1
>>
>> CoE: The IBA has no WRV. �coppro did not specify which bank e intended
>> to deposit eir WRV into.
>>
>
Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 21:41, comex wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> IBA 3 2 0 0 1 1 9 1 1 8 9 1
>> CoE: The IBA has no WRV. coppro did not specify which bank e intended
>> to deposit eir WRV into.
>>
> Pr
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 21:41, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> IBA 3 2 0 0 1 1 9 1 1 8 9 1
>
> CoE: The IBA has no WRV. coppro did not specify which bank e intended
> to deposit eir WRV into.
>
Proto-Denied. It seemed reas
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I harvest 2259 and 1 to turn a 2 ranch into a 1 ranch.
O.o
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 15:09, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Agoran Agricultural Association
>
> In the future, could you please post the report after the actions? Makes
> it easier on us.
>
Yes sorry. I forgot I had actions to process until after I had sent
the report. The current state
Roger Hicks wrote:
> Agoran Agricultural Association
In the future, could you please post the report after the actions? Makes
it easier on us.
Also, you are the Scorekeepor. How come you can't ensure your
revocations of points succeed? This is an equitable contract; taking
reparative action if ne
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Origin IP is 64.17.129.3 or possibly 64.17.152.116. There were two
> messages within the past 15 minutes, both with the subject "BobTHJ's
> actions (automated)".
Your origin IP is smh*.opentransfer.com. Only one was received at my
end, the one
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Origin IP is 64.17.129.3 or possibly 64.17.152.116. There were two
> messages within the past 15 minutes, both with the subject "BobTHJ's
> actions (automated)".
>
> Thanks,
> BobTHJ
I received one such message.
--
-c.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:21, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:19, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:15, Taral wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
H. Distributor: the automated e-mails from my site don't seem to be
reaching the li
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:15, Taral wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> H. Distributor: the automated e-mails from my site don't seem to be
>> reaching the list. Do you have spam filtering of some sort active that
>> may be catching them?
>
> I can look if you give me
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:19, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:15, Taral wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> H. Distributor: the automated e-mails from my site don't seem to be
>>> reaching the list. Do you have spam filtering of some sort active that
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> H. Distributor: the automated e-mails from my site don't seem to be
> reaching the list. Do you have spam filtering of some sort active that
> may be catching them?
I can look if you give me a timestamp and origin IP or envelope return address
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:22 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I buy two Digit Ranches and a Mill.
You can only buy 1 land per week...
coppro wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> coppro 6 5 8 5 1 4 3 9 5 17 3 1
>
> I mill 0 - 7 = 4.
> I mill 9 - 3 = 6.
> I mill 7 * 4 = 6.
>
> I harvest 2643 for 2 WRVs.
> I harvest 2637 for 2 WRVs.
> I harvest 2639 for 2 WRVs.
> I harvest 2638 for 2 WRVs.
>
> I harve
Roger Hicks wrote:
> coppro 6 5 8 5 1 4 3 9 5 17 3 1
I mill 0 - 7 = 4.
I mill 9 - 3 = 6.
I mill 7 * 4 = 6.
I harvest 2643 for 2 WRVs.
I harvest 2637 for 2 WRVs.
I harvest 2639 for 2 WRVs.
I harvest 2638 for 2 WRVs.
I harvest 955 for 8 random crops.
I harvest 683
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 13:08, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I intend, without 3 objections, to flip the contestmaster of the AAA to
> BobTHJ.
>
If you resolve this I'm all set to process SoA actions.
Thanks,
BobTHJ
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 08:50, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I harvest 2631, 2632, 2633, 2634, 2635 (CFJ numbers) for two WRV each,
>> using X crops as needed. If I am unable to harvest all of these
>> numbers I instead harvest as many as possible.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> I harvest 2631, 2632, 2633, 2634, 2635 (CFJ numbers) for two WRV each,
> using X crops as needed. If I am unable to harvest all of these
> numbers I instead harvest as many as possible.
Note: the Date: header on this message is earlier than th
2009/6/15 Geoffrey Spear :
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I create a digit ranch with a seed of 9 in BobTHJ's possession.
>> I create a digit ranch with a seed of 7 in BobTHJ's possession.
>
> One of these was a purchase. I revoke 3 points from BobTHJ (I believe
> eir
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> With the unanimous consent of myself, I amend Agricultural Timeshare
> v1.1 to read as follows:
>
> {
> This is an equitable public contract and a pledge. The name of this
> contract is "Agricultural Timeshare v1.2".
>
> A Farmer CAN join t
Ed Murphy wrote:
> coppro wrote:
>
>> Rather than set up a bunch of pledges, wouldn't it be easier to use the
>> IBA?
>
> tl;dr. I may get around to grokking it one of these months.
QFGT. A quick glance at the IBA, though, suggests that the Offer
mechanism isn't entirely prepared to deal with t
coppro wrote:
> Rather than set up a bunch of pledges, wouldn't it be easier to use the
> IBA?
tl;dr. I may get around to grokking it one of these months.
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> I agree to the following:
>
>
>
> Pavitra
Rather than set up a bunch of pledges, wouldn't it be easier to use the
IBA? which allows these operations to take place platonically and
provides a nice consistent framework (I do believe I have one
outstanding Offer).
Wooble wrote:
> I revoke 3 points from Murphy.
> I create a mill with an operator of / in Murphy's possession.
I bought a Digit Ranch this week, not a Mill. (I bought a Mill last
week, and already got it.)
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> I feel generous and give Tom (who has no ranches) a 3, a 4, a 5, and an 8.
I'm treating this as too ambiguous to succeed; was this intended to
transfer ranches or crops?
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 18:51 -0400, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> I offer ais523 a trade of my 4s for eir 9s
I'm happy to trade up to half of the 9s I own to you in exchange for an
equal number of 4s.
I'll give you a pledge to this effect if you want, but I'm catching up
on the Notary's report atm and
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 14:16, Alexander Smith wrote:
> Wooble wrote:
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> > I thought the asset rule restricted ownership to persons?
>> Nope. It doesn't even restrict recordkeepors to persons. I don't
>> think any other rule uses "entity" m
Wooble wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> > I thought the asset rule restricted ownership to persons?
> Nope. It doesn't even restrict recordkeepors to persons. I don't
> think any other rule uses "entity" more often.
This is even useful on occasion; for instance, En
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> I thought the asset rule restricted ownership to persons?
Nope. It doesn't even restrict recordkeepors to persons. I don't
think any other rule uses "entity" more often.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:15, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Quazie wrote:
>> Could we restrict it to people? Players? Something?
>
> Players wouldn't solve IB&A's issue. On the other hand, I probably
> don't want to have to track what crops some random person transf
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Quazie wrote:
> Could we restrict it to people? Players? Something?
Players wouldn't solve IB&A's issue. On the other hand, I probably
don't want to have to track what crops some random person transferred
to a small teacup in orbit around the Sun. Hmm.
Player
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I intend, without 3 Objections, to make the following changes to the
> AAA contract:
> {{
> In Section 4, remove "Ownership of Crops is restricted to Farmers.
>
> In Section 10, remove "Ownership of Water Rights Vouchers is
> restricted to F
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I mill 0 - 9 = X.
0-9 = 2; fails.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> I believe my millings happened even if the subsequent harvesting
> failed, but to make things clear:
> If I have no 2 crops, I mill 3/7=2
> If I have no 4 crops, I mill 7-3=4
> (or maybe this was a corrected report of the crop holdings of t
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> FYI, it appears I can click on anyone's nickname to edit their crop
> and ranch holdings.
I'm not sure if that's a bug or a feature but I guess I should fix it...
2009/5/6 Roger Hicks :
> FYI, it appears I can click on anyone's nickname to edit their crop
> and ranch holdings.
AAApedia
The AAA report anyone can edit
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 09:16, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 09:02, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> I went through everyone's holdings from the last report and reapplied
>>> all of the transactions, and these are the current holdin
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 09:02, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I went through everyone's holdings from the last report and reapplied
>> all of the transactions, and these are the current holdings.
>> Obviously my transition from plain text files to an
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 09:02, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I went through everyone's holdings from the last report and reapplied
> all of the transactions, and these are the current holdings.
> Obviously my transition from plain text files to an automated system
> failed horribly; my apologies.
>
Autom
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Crop/WRV Holdings
> Player 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
>
> AFO 28 10 2 6 7 2 6 35 14 13 3 0
> ais523 12 6 5 1 4
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I revoke 3 points from coppro.
This failed; coppro did not have any points to revoke.
-root
Wooble wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Quazie wrote:
>> There should be a place where all old assets go. We need a 'Dusty old
>> closet' where all assets are tracked once they stop being useful.
>
> Your old assets (at least, the AAA ones) are currently owned by the
> Lost and Found D
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Quazie wrote:
> I join the AAA, or request to join the AAA, which ever is effective.
>
> I humbly ask for my farmer stuff back.
>
> I also request that if anyone else has my stuff that I get the back too.
>
> I will gladly give you some of my stuff if you can help
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:53 -0400, Quazie wrote:
> Well how do I get my stuff out of the Lost and Found?
Assets can be transferred from it without objection, IIRC.
--
ais523
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Quazie wrote:
>> There should be a place where all old assets go. We need a 'Dusty old
>> closet' where all assets are tracked once they stop being useful.
>
> Your old assets (at least, the AAA ones) are c
Quazie wrote:
> There should be a place where all old assets go. We need a 'Dusty old
> closet' where all assets are tracked once they stop being useful.
We do have the Lost and Found Department (R2166) where assets go if
the rules/contracts forget to define an owner for them, and the
Accountor
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Quazie wrote:
> There should be a place where all old assets go. We need a 'Dusty old
> closet' where all assets are tracked once they stop being useful.
Your old assets (at least, the AAA ones) are currently owned by the
Lost and Found Department. The ones with
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Quazie wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Quazie wrote:
> Having received no objections, I cause 0x44, Elysion, Quazie, and Sir
> Toby to cease
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Quazie wrote:
> I wish that I could cryogenically freeze my state every time i leave
> agora. I always come back, but I have to start from scratch each
> time.
You should form a contract with someone requiring them to object to
any attempts to deregister you and
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Quazie wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Quazie wrote:
Having received no objections, I cause 0x44, Elysion, Quazie, and Sir
Toby to cease to be Farmers.
>>>
>>> I frown at this,
>>
>> I wouldn'
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Quazie wrote:
>>> Having received no objections, I cause 0x44, Elysion, Quazie, and Sir
>>> Toby to cease to be Farmers.
>>>
>>
>> I frown at this,
>
> I wouldn't object to an amendment restoring your crops,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:16 -0400, Quazie wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Geoffrey Spear
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Geoffrey Spear
>> > wrote:
>> >> I intend, without objection, to cause 0x44 to cease to be
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Quazie wrote:
>> Having received no objections, I cause 0x44, Elysion, Quazie, and Sir
>> Toby to cease to be Farmers.
>>
>
> I frown at this,
I wouldn't object to an amendment restoring your crops, considering the timing.
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:16 -0400, Quazie wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Geoffrey Spear
> > wrote:
> >> I intend, without objection, to cause 0x44 to cease to be a Farmer.
> >> I intend, without objection, to cause Elysion t
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I intend, without objection, to cause 0x44 to cease to be a Farmer.
>> I intend, without objection, to cause Elysion to cease to be a Farmer.
>> I intend, without objection, to cau
ais523 wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 13:29 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I agree to the following:
>> 4. If Wooble fails to transfer crops within the specified deadline, e
>> shall transfer to the Farmer either the points e received or crops
>> sufficient to harvest the ID of another proposal i
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 13:29 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I agree to the following:
> 4. If Wooble fails to transfer crops within the specified deadline, e
> shall transfer to the Farmer either the points e received or crops
> sufficient to harvest the ID of another proposal in the same chamber
>
2009/4/20 Geoffrey Spear :
> I award 8+2i points to Murphy for harvesting 2 democratic proposals
> and an ordinary proposal.
>
> Tiger's request for subsidization in denied; e has 5 lands (3 ranches,
> 2 mills) and the subsidy is 4.
>
> --SoA Wooble
>
Oh. That's right, it's "lands", not "ranches".
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Same here, though I suspect this fails because I harvested some
> proposal numbers recently.
No, it fails because you have 6 lands and the subsidy is 4.
I didn't award any points last week; I will do so as soon as I finish
confirming the harves
2009/4/20 Ed Murphy :
> Tiger wrote:
>
>> I request subsidization.
>> (I'm not sure about when points were last awarded, but from a quick
>> search in the scoreboards it seems the subsidy should have went up to
>> 4 this week.)
>
> Same here, though I suspect this fails because I harvested some
> p
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I mill 9 - 5 = 4.
>
> If I have another 5 crop, I mill 5 - 3 = 2.
I don't believe you had any 5 crops at all when this was published;
your 5 ranch was created at the start of the week after crops were
produced, and I see no other transactions f
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I request subsidy.
nttpf
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> --SoA Wooble
I request subsidy.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I create a digit ranch with a seed of 3 in coppro's possession.
> I create a WRV in coppro's possession.
I request subsidy.
I purchase a mill.
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 01:21 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > http://www.nomictools.com/agora/aaa
> >
> > Federal Subsidy: 7
>
> I join the AAA. I ask for subs.
>
You already were a party, according to my records.
--
ais523
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> I wish to purchase a Digit Ranch. (Can I do that with those y-points I
> got from Enigma?)
I've been interpreting "3 Points" to mean x-axis points, as y-axis
ones would usually be called "3i Points" I think. However, that
portion of the
I wish to purchase a Digit Ranch. (Can I do that with those y-points I
got from Enigma?)
--
-Tiger
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> Crop/WRV Holdings
>> Player 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
>>
>> OscarMeyr 2 7 2 0 26 15
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 17:18, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2009, at 8:15 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 17:02, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 4, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>>
Crop/WRV Holdings
Player 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
On Feb 4, 2009, at 8:15 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 17:02, Benjamin Schultz
wrote:
On Feb 4, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Crop/WRV Holdings
Player 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
---
On Feb 4, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Crop/WRV Holdings
Player 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
OscarMeyr 2 7 2 0 26 15 1 6 19 2 9 0
Warrigal 7 0 0 13 0 0 0 0
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 15:03 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
> CROP & WRV HOLDINGS
> Farmer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X WRV
> -
> AFO53 35 1 0 3 0 3 40 11 26 1 0
> ais523
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 22:18, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Warrigal8 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
>
> I have too many crops. I PBA-deposit a 0 crop.
>
>> Warrigal0 0 0 1
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 07:16, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I PBA-deposit an 8 crop.
> I PBA-withdraw a 1 crop.
>
> I harvest 107, an amended power-3 rule, for 8 crops.
> I harvest 955, an amended power-3 rule, for 8 crops.
> I harvest 1728, an amended power-3 rule, for 8 crops. [usi
OscarMeyr wrote:
> Here's an idea for AAA: Harvest a mutated rule to turn a mill into a
> specified other kind of mill, or a digit ranch into a random other
> digit ranch. This will need supporting changes to the parts that say
> that a land CANNOT be changed once created.
Or harvest to d
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16 Nov 2008, at 15:52, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
>
>> I don't see the farm on there. Do I have to get an account and log in?
>
>
> Apparently it's unlinked. http://www.nomictools.com/agora/aaa
>
That page is out of date
On Nov 16, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 16 Nov 2008, at 16:03, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Shiny! Thanks very much.
Thank Wooble, not me :)
Thanks to you ehird for reminding me of the link, and thanks to
Wooble for the page.
And now, a shiny -- for the LOL caption:
http://p
On 16 Nov 2008, at 16:03, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Shiny! Thanks very much.
Thank Wooble, not me :)
On Nov 16, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 16 Nov 2008, at 15:52, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I don't see the farm on there. Do I have to get an account and
log in?
Apparently it's unlinked. http://www.nomictools.com/agora/aaa
Shiny! Thanks very much.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3O
On 16 Nov 2008, at 15:52, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I don't see the farm on there. Do I have to get an account and log
in?
Apparently it's unlinked. http://www.nomictools.com/agora/aaa
On Nov 16, 2008, at 10:46 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
http://nomictools.com
I don't see the farm on there. Do I have to get an account and log in?
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On 16 Nov 2008, at 15:45, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I think the AAA report is on a web page somewhere, but I lost the
URL. Somebody please repost it.
http://nomictools.com
--
ehird
I think the AAA report is on a web page somewhere, but I lost the
URL. Somebody please repost it.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:19 PM, Taral wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I harvest 107, an amended power-3 rule, for 8 crops.
I harvest 955, an amended power-3 rule, for 8 crops.
I attempt to harvest 1728, an amended power-3 rule, for 8 crops. (Is
mutation
On Oct 29, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 22:13, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I mill 0 - 9 = 2 using Land #48.
I mill 8 / 4 = 2 using Land #68.
And in case I need it: I mill 4 / 8 = 6 using Land #68.
This last milling fails (you already used y
On 29 Oct 2008, at 18:08, Alex Smith wrote:
I PBA-deposit a 9 crop [gaining ^19].
I PBA-withdraw a 0 crop [paying ^9].
I PBA-deposit two 6 crops [gaining ^28+^27=^55].
I PBA-withdraw four 7 crops [paying ^11+^12+^13+^14=^50].
I PBA-withdraw two 4 crops [paying ^6+^7=^13].
works
--
ehird
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 22:13, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I mill 0 - 9 = 2 using Land #48.
> I mill 8 / 4 = 2 using Land #68.
>
> I harvest 2235, a newly created CFJ number.
> I harvest 2237, a newly created CFJ number.
> I harvest 2238, a newly created CFJ number.
>
> That shoul
1 - 100 of 325 matches
Mail list logo
