DIS: Re: BUS: Accusations

2009-10-15 Thread comex
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: Note that I'm not advocating removing penalties for mis-performing or non-performing officers. They need to be retained for cases of gross negligence in repeatedly ignoring duties even after becoming aware of the issue.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Accusations

2009-10-15 Thread Sean Hunt
comex wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: Note that I'm not advocating removing penalties for mis-performing or non-performing officers. They need to be retained for cases of gross negligence in repeatedly ignoring duties even after becoming aware of

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Accusations

2009-10-15 Thread Roger Hicks
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 16:54, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: Note that I'm not advocating removing penalties for mis-performing or non-performing officers. They need to be retained for cases of gross

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Accusations

2009-10-15 Thread Sean Hunt
Roger Hicks wrote: My point is this: If we saddle officers with hefty fines for minor infractions, then who's going to want to go through the work of being an officer? BobTHJ It indicates the rules are broken (possibly recordkeeping duties are too complex), and I would prefer fixing the

DIS: Re: BUS: Accusations

2009-10-12 Thread Sean Hunt
Roger Hicks wrote: I contest all of these. Borrowing from the practice of the previous Insulator Murphy (a practice which was discussed on the lists and mutually agreed upon to be valid) I announced the validity of these NOVs as part of the weekly Insulator report. BobTHJ You did until you

DIS: Re: BUS: Accusations

2009-10-12 Thread Roger Hicks
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 13:59, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Roger Hicks wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 13:45, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2230, a Power-2 Rule, by failing to announce publicly the validity of the NoV identified

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Accusations

2009-10-12 Thread Ed Murphy
Pavitra wrote: Roger Hicks wrote: I humbly request the CotC refuse the excess cases initiated above. That would effectively dismiss some of the charges; should the CotC have the power to arbitrarily impose an upper limit on the severity of criminal punishment? That sounds like a job for