On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:17 PM, comex wrote:
> When a judicial question is applicable and open, and its case
> has a judge assigned to it, the judge CAN assign a valid
> judgement to it by announcement, and SHALL do so as soon as
> possible, unless e is recused from the case
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:12, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Irrelevant. The audit rule specifically attempts to address what would
>> occur if there is no auditing entity (and by this we can only infer
>> that the author's intent was non-person e
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Irrelevant. The audit rule specifically attempts to address what would
>> occur if there is no auditing entity (and by this we can only infer
>> that the author's intent was non-perso
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Irrelevant. The audit rule specifically attempts to address what would
> occur if there is no auditing entity (and by this we can only infer
> that the author's intent was non-person entity). Since it would be
> impossible for the Accountor to
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:34, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Address: what if the auditing entity is a non-person?
>
> A non-person shouldn't be able to hold one of the Dealor offices or
> take an action such as playing a Penalty Box card. If it
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Address: what if the auditing entity is a non-person?
A non-person shouldn't be able to hold one of the Dealor offices or
take an action such as playing a Penalty Box card. If it can, that's
a bug.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:27, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> When any other entity is audited the auditing entity (or the Accountor
>> if the auditing entity is a non-person) CAN and SHALL as soon as
>> possible (by announcement)
>
> I don't think
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> When any other entity is audited the auditing entity (or the Accountor
> if the auditing entity is a non-person) CAN and SHALL as soon as
> possible (by announcement)
I don't think the current rule is ambiguous at all. And making it so
you c
8 matches
Mail list logo
