ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 11:08 -0400, comex wrote:
>> obligations are created; it's just that TITE makes these obligations
> Murphy, I suggest adding TITE to your acronyms list. It seems likely to
> come up more often in future...
I'll reconsider the issue once the recent proposals t
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 11:08 -0400, comex wrote:
> obligations are created; it's just that TITE makes these obligations
Murphy, I suggest adding TITE to your acronyms list. It seems likely to
come up more often in future...
--
ais523
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:53 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal, Partner Responsibility, AI-2:
>>
>> --
>> Amend Rul
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, Partner Responsibility, AI-2:
>
> --
> Amend Rule 2145 by appending the following text:
>
>If a judge finds a partne
On Oct 5, 2008, at 12:17 AM, Ben Caplan wrote:
On Saturday 04 October 2008 10:13:57 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
On behalf of The Law-abiding Partnership:
{
The Law-abiding Partnership registers.
The Law-abiding Partnership claims, to Agora, that it is the
ambas
Goethe wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, Partner Responsibility, AI-2:
Good idea, and I already have something similar protoed in my Rests
proposal, but I suggest we pass this one while I work out the details
of mine (which could take a while).
--
ais523
<>
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> It doesn't enforce itself any less than any other partnership. If
> this doesn't lead to an equity case, it's the partners that are at
> fault, not the partnership.
Proof of the pudding and all that, a partnership is not just its
rules but its members. I w
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
> It requires its parties to ensure that it obeys the rules. Back before
> Take It To Equity, the partners could be prosecuted for the
> partnership's rule breaches.
>
> I still thing TITE was a bad idea.
I'll meet you halfway. I think TITE was the right thi
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>> On behalf of The Law-abiding Partnership:
>>> {
>>> The Law-abiding Partnership registers.
>>> The Law-abiding Partnership claims, to Agora, that it is the ambassador.
>>> }
>>>
>>
On Saturday 04 October 2008 10:13:57 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> >> On behalf of The Law-abiding Partnership:
> >> {
> >> The Law-abiding Partnership registers.
> >> The Law-abiding Partnership claims, to Agora, that it is the
> >> ambassador. }
> >
> > An obvio
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 20:41, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal, Partner Responsibility, AI-2:
>
> --
> Amend Rule 2145 by appending the following text:
>
>If a judge finds a partner
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On behalf of The Law-abiding Partnership:
>> {
>> The Law-abiding Partnership registers.
>> The Law-abiding Partnership claims, to Agora, that it is the ambassador.
>> }
>>
> An obvious breach of the contract, which we seem to have no means of
> enforcing
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:03 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ihope and I have agreed to this contract:
> {
> 1. The name of this contract is "The Law-abiding Partnership".
> 2. This is a public contract and a partnership.
> 3. Parties to this contract SHALL ensure that this partnership follow
13 matches
Mail list logo
