My copy of the Ruleset contains no such judgement as DISCHARGE. You
probably meant DISMISS? (Given that you still resolved the actual issue,
INSUFFICIENT is probably inappropriate.)
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
I'm running out of time to judge CFJ 3674. I'm planning to write up a
longer opinion later, and am sorry I've been so busy.
Summary verdict:
I judge DISCHARGE in CFJ 3674, because the caller hasn't outlined
whether there were in fact any intentions to perform actions without
objection at that time. However, I further rule that were there any
intents to perform actions without N objections, the intent would have
succeeded, because objections are counted at the time the action is
taken, not when the objection is made. Under the present
circumstances, it would not be excessively difficult to locate G.'s
categorical objection when someone attempted to take such an action.
