Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3688 judgement

2018-11-25 Thread Kerim Aydin
Sorry about that, I actually had 2-3 process reasons (i.e. in Motions and Moots processes) that 2 judges at once would break things enough to violate R217 - I'd written up the first one (probably the weakest as it relied on grammar alone) but that's where I stalled out for a while (and delay

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3688 judgement

2018-11-16 Thread Aris Merchant
Indeed. For example, the earth is inhabited by a person, to wit, it is inhabited by Hillary Rodham Clinton (our traditional example non-player human). It may also be inhabited by other persons, but that doesn't matter. Technically, I believe this acts as an existential quantifier. -Aris On Fri,

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3688 judgement

2018-11-16 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: R591 contains: When a CFJ is open and assigned to a judge, that judge CAN assign a valid judgement to it by announcement, and SHALL do so in a timely fashion after this becomes possible. If e does not, the Arbitor CAN remove em from