H. Judge Aris, reminder: this is due tomorrow.
Gaelan
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Kerim Aydin
> Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJs 3705 and 3706 judged FALSE
> Date: February 7, 2019 at 6:17:48 PM PST
> To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
> Reply-To: agora-disc
(bwa ha ha - I am hijacking the court system for my nefarious ends - if
it leads to some deep philosophy-based CFJ it gets bonus points in the
contest IMO).
On 2/7/2019 5:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I think that the judgement should address the issue specifically given that
it has come up and i
(I wrote this before seeing Ørjan's reply)
Gaelan
> On Feb 7, 2019, at 4:58 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> I, unsurprisingly, disagree. You assume that there is a 1:1 mapping between
> intents and announcements of intents. I'd argue otherwise—I announced the
> same intent in both messages. The
I, unsurprisingly, disagree. You assume that there is a 1:1 mapping between
intents and announcements of intents. I'd argue otherwise—I announced the same
intent in both messages. The rules don't define what an intent is or specify
how one is created, so we fall back to the conventional English
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 4:47 PM Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019, Aris Merchant wrote:
>
> > Gaelan tried to win by Apathy, using one buried intent to satisfy
> R1728(2)
> > and then another open intent to satisfy R1728(1). This relies on the
> assumption
> > that the R1728(1) and R1728(
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019, Aris Merchant wrote:
Gaelan tried to win by Apathy, using one buried intent to satisfy R1728(2)
and then another open intent to satisfy R1728(1). This relies on the assumption
that the R1728(1) and R1728(2) intents can be separate from each other.
However, this is not the cas
6 matches
Mail list logo
