On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 16:15, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
It's
ambiguous whether deregistration or degregistration was meant, so
the last paragraph of Rule 2197 prevents it from having any effect
On 30 Dec 2008, at 17:01, Roger Hicks wrote:
Argument: Ehird has made multiple attempts to deregister though until
this attempt e has failed to send them to the appropriate forum. It is
clear e desires to leave the game
haha, no. I was just messing with you all with that forum stuff.
2008/12/29, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
I degregister.
Just to make sure, you might want to spell it correctly.
I don't know why you're leaving Agora too.
--
w1n5t0n aka
Charles Schaefer
On 29 Dec 2008, at 22:56, Charles Schaefer wrote:
Just to make sure, you might want to spell it correctly.
Hehehehehehehe...
On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 14:56 -0800, Charles Schaefer wrote:
2008/12/29, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
I degregister.
Just to make sure, you might want to spell it correctly.
I don't know why you're leaving Agora too.
This actually is a reminder of a recent scam at
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
It's
ambiguous whether deregistration or degregistration was meant, so
the last paragraph of Rule 2197 prevents it from having any effect
(contract-related or otherwise).
Gratuitous argument: R101 takes precedence over
On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 18:15 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
It's
ambiguous whether deregistration or degregistration was meant, so
the last paragraph of Rule 2197 prevents it from having any effect
(contract-related or
Wooble wrote:
Gratuitous argument: R101 takes precedence over R2197 (and the rest of
the ruleset, pretty much); no interpretation of the rules can deprive
a player of eir right to cease to be a player. Interpreting a typo to
deprive one of ones rights would be a particularly bad
On 29 Dec 2008, at 23:01, Ed Murphy wrote:
Caller's arguments: degregistration was re-defined as joining the
UNDAD contract as recently as a couple months ago (see CFJ 2237).
It's
ambiguous whether deregistration or degregistration was meant, so
the last paragraph of Rule 2197 prevents it
On 29 Dec 2008, at 23:08, Alex Smith wrote:
a-d
a-b, actually.
10 matches
Mail list logo
