Yally wrote:
I opine REMAND as the Justicar's Opinion. I lean.
The opinion was ineffective because with/without prejudice was
not specified.
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
CFJ 2805a entered its four-day overtime period about two hours
ago. See Rule 911 for details; H. Justiciar Yally, take note.
I opine REMAND, requesting that H. Judge coppro explicitly address the
pros/cons of accepting
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 17:04 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
(Only other standing judges are ais523 who initiated, and BobTHJ who
has rank 1. I'm going to keep doing this as long as people keep
forgetting to disqualify; determining conceptual conflict of interest
is not part of the CotC's job
ais523 wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 17:04 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
(Only other standing judges are ais523 who initiated, and BobTHJ who
has rank 1. I'm going to keep doing this as long as people keep
forgetting to disqualify; determining conceptual conflict of interest
is not part of the
On 1/16/08, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote MURPHY.
Updated summary:
There are still 6 days to go.
Zefram ZEFRAM
rootZEFRAM
pikhq ZEFRAM
ErisZEFRAM
Goethe MURPHY
Murphy MURPHY
O.Meyr MURPHY
Wooble MURPHY
BobTHJ COMEX (unless one of the other COMEX votes
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008 2:58 AM, Levi Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I initiate an Agoran Decision to resolve the holder of the CotC office.
The valid options are ZEFRAM, COMEX and MURPHY.
If there are at least 2 other votes for COMEX I vote COMEX. Otherwise
I vote MURPHY.
On Jan 15, 2008 5:08 PM, Levi Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I interpret this as meaning at the time of this message.
Conditional messages are only allowed when the rules allow them, which
is currently only with R2127 votes.
comex wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008 5:08 PM, Levi Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I interpret this as meaning at the time of this message.
Conditional messages are only allowed when the rules allow them, which
is currently only with R2127 votes.
Ok. R2127, does say that the condition is evaluated
On Jan 15, 2008 6:23 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally, I do declare: we shall *not* have a briber running the courts!
Bribery? In *my* campaign?
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 16:27:23 comex wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008 6:23 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally, I do declare: we shall *not* have a briber running the courts!
Bribery? In *my* campaign?
Need I remind you of your usage of the Vote Market to try to get me to vote
comex wrote:
-- From CFJ 1750 to 1800, the average time from being called to
assignment was about 13 hours. Daunting,
As e's doing such a good job of advertising my achievements, I hereby
assign comex as my re-election campaign manager.
-zefram
On 1/15/08, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More likely that you'd think.
DOH!
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
-- Unknown
comex wrote:
If Murphy will not bring the CotC database up, e may as well say so.
I have ample time to assign CFJs and even maintain a database if
necessary, but one already exists, and Murphy seems to be the only one
that can access it. I will neither object to this nor support it.
The
The following issues are also pending:
* HP2's judgement of CFJ 1647
* comex's judgement of CFJ 1611
* Assignment of CFJs 1688-94
Also, assignment of a Board of Appeals to CFJ 1684.
On May 23, 2007, at 4:11 PM, comex wrote:
I assign CFJs 1659-60 to the Hanging Judge. Levi is psuedo-assigned.
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/
2007-May/006402.html
I assign CFJs 1661-5 to the Hanging Judge. BobTHJ is psuedo-assigned.
Zefram wrote:
I approve the Hanging Judge judging CFJs 1666-1667 according
to the pseudo-judgement that Murphy published in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED].
...
On behalf of the Hanging Judge, CFJs 1666-8 are judged FALSE.
...
I pseudo-judge CFJs 1666 and 1667 false, as direct consequences of the
16 matches
Mail list logo
