On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 08:31 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > A player CAN publish a Notice of Violation (with N support,
>
> I've never liked this bit. Unless the Distributor blocks me, I CAN
> publish whatever I want. Probably the creation
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Sorry, re-reading this thread, maybe I missed something: was this a
> systematic attempt to break out every instance in the Rules in which two
> different actions in a single rule are two different ways of breaking
> the rules? I think the fact that there were only a few in
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I can understand that. In that case, just drop all specific officer-
> lateness tinkering (e.g. the Herald) and you're good to go! I guess
> my whole point is: re-level systematically, or re-level none, but don't
> re-level 2 or 3 picked more-or-less at r
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> True, but the problem now is that the severity of the offense really
>> has nothing to do with the power of the rule, which is the current
>> default. Many tasks are at high AI because a quantity happens to be
>> secured, not because th
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> True, but the problem now is that the severity of the offense really
> has nothing to do with the power of the rule, which is the current
> default. Many tasks are at high AI because a quantity happens to be
> secured, not because the task is inherently more important. In fac
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Hmm... while I like this, it does have the drawback that then all
>> deadlines are equal when they shouldn't be. Really Bad Trumpeting is a
>> far lesser offense than failing to distribute proposals.
>>
> But since all these actions can be deputized anyway
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> If a rule states that a certain person is required to perform an
>> action within a specified time limit, and does not name a Specific
>> crime for failure to comply within the time limit, then failure
>> is the Specific Crime of Delay of Gam
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:47, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I was thinking of something like the following:
>>
>> If a rule states that a certain person is required to perform an
>> action within a specified time limit, and does not name a Specific
>> crime for failure to com
coppro wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
A player CAN publish a Notice of Violation (with N support,
>>> I've never liked this bit. Unless the Distributor blocks me, I CAN
>>> publish whatever I
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> You don't need this to do that. They're two separate paragraphs and
>>> two separate types of actions, so they're already two different ways of
>>> violating the rule. Point remains: "lateness of an Officer's asa
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> You don't need this to do that. They're two separate paragraphs and
>> two separate types of actions, so they're already two different ways of
>> violating the rule. Point remains: "lateness of an Officer's asap duty"
>> should be a g
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> You don't need this to do that. They're two separate paragraphs and
> two separate types of actions, so they're already two different ways of
> violating the rule. Point remains: "lateness of an Officer's asap duty"
> should be a general rule with a leveled set of consequen
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> As soon as possible after a patent title is awarded or revoked,
>>> the Herald SHALL announce the award or revocation. Failure to do
>>> so is the Crime of Really Awful Trumpetry.
>
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> As soon as possible after a patent title is awarded or revoked,
>> the Herald SHALL announce the award or revocation. Failure to do
>> so is the Crime of Really Awful Trumpetry.
>
>
> If you're going to single out one
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> A player CAN publish a Notice of Violation (with N support,
>> I've never liked this bit. Unless the Distributor blocks me, I CAN
>> publish whatever I want. Probably the
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> A player CAN publish a Notice of Violation (with N support,
>
> I've never liked this bit. Unless the Distributor blocks me, I CAN
> publish whatever I want. Probably the creation of the NoV shou
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> As soon as possible after a patent title is awarded or revoked,
> the Herald SHALL announce the award or revocation. Failure to do
> so is the Crime of Really Awful Trumpetry.
If you're going to single out one officer, or a small set of offi
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> A player CAN publish a Notice of Violation (with N support,
I've never liked this bit. Unless the Distributor blocks me, I CAN
publish whatever I want. Probably the creation of the NoV should be
separated from the publication of the allegati
18 matches
Mail list logo
