Goethe wrote:
> Notice of Violation:
> Actor: ehird.
> Action: Failure to publish a an apology explaining eir error, shame,
> remorse, and ardent desire for self-improvement, ASAP after
> being sentenced to GUILTY/APOLOGY in CFJ 2347.
> Rule violat
ehird wrote:
> I initiate a criminal CFJ against myself for violating rule 101 by
> failing to be a pink elephant.
> Arguments: I did it. I accept full responsibility for my breach of the
> rules. I am guilty.
> Arguments: According to Goethe, if you admit you breached the rules
> you're guilty, r
ehird wrote:
> I initiate a criminal CFJ against myself for violating rule 101 by
> failing to be a pink elephant.
> Arguments: I did it. I accept full responsibility for my breach of the
> rules. I am guilty.
> Arguments: According to Goethe, if you admit you breached the rules
> you're guilty, r
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Crimes committed during the voting period could also have been NoVed
> and crim-cased during the voting period, though this would be more
> difficult toward the end; I should have made the cutoff no later than
> the start of the voting period. Of course, if
Goethe wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> 2009/2/27 Kerim Aydin :
>>> As pointed out, the previous NoV was not in fact an NoV.
>>>
>>> Notice of Violation:
>>> Actor: Â Â Â Â Â ehird.
>>> Action: Â Â Â Â Failure to publish a an apology explaining eir error,
>>> shame,
>>
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> 2009/2/27 Kerim Aydin :
>>> Crime: Class-3 Crime of Failure to Apologize (R1504).
>>
>> Is this not also invalid per R2239?
>
> Probably. Is failure to publish something instantaneous upon the time limi
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/2/27 Kerim Aydin :
>>
>> As pointed out, the previous NoV was not in fact an NoV.
>>
>> Notice of Violation:
>> Actor: ehird.
>> Action: Failure to publish a an apology explaining eir error, shame,
>> remorse, and ard
2009/2/27 Kerim Aydin :
>
> As pointed out, the previous NoV was not in fact an NoV.
>
> Notice of Violation:
> Actor: ehird.
> Action: Failure to publish a an apology explaining eir error, shame,
> remorse, and ardent desire for self-improvement, ASAP after
>
2009/2/27 Ed Murphy :
> Denied:
My mind, 'tis slipping.
ehird wrote:
> 2009/2/27 Ed Murphy :
>> ais523 wrote:
>>
I register with the name "ehird".
>>> H. Insulator Murphy / H. Herald Sgeo, how many Rests does ehird have at
>>> the moment?
>> 5.
>
> CoE: 4, according to last Insulator report.
Denied:
> Insulator's Fnord Report
>
> Date of this
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> I think the above notice might be invalid; isn't Failure to Apologise a
> defined Crime?
Indeed, I missed that. -g.
2009/2/27 Ed Murphy :
> ais523 wrote:
>
>>> I register with the name "ehird".
>> H. Insulator Murphy / H. Herald Sgeo, how many Rests does ehird have at
>> the moment?
>
> 5.
CoE: 4, according to last Insulator report.
ais523 wrote:
>> I register with the name "ehird".
> H. Insulator Murphy / H. Herald Sgeo, how many Rests does ehird have at
> the moment?
5.
> (And ehird: you should have waited a couple of days before
> reregistering, you'd only have had half as many...)
E would have had 2.
> This meets
> de
2009/2/27 Kerim Aydin :
> Notice of Violation:
> Actor: ehird.
> Action: Failure to publish a an apology explaining eir error, shame,
> remorse, and ardent desire for self-improvement, ASAP after
> being sentenced to GUILTY/APOLOGY in CFJ 2347.
> Rule
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 17:56 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, comex wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> Notice of Violation:
> >> Actor: ehird.
> >> Action: Failure to publish a an apology explaining eir error,
> >> shame,
> >>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:50 PM, comex wrote:
> I contest this. NoVing someone immediately upon joining is very rude.
> E ceased to play for a month, let em be.
Dodging punishments by leaving the game is permitted -- but don't
expect to rejoin without paying your dues.
--
Taral
"Please let m
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> Arguments: According to Goethe, if you admit you breached the rules
>> you're guilty, regardless of whether or not the rules say you're
>> guilty.
>
> I didn't say that. We're talking about cases where (a) we ac
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> Arguments: According to Goethe, if you admit you breached the rules
> you're guilty, regardless of whether or not the rules say you're
> guilty.
I didn't say that. We're talking about cases where (a) we actually
interpret an action as a breach; in whic
18 matches
Mail list logo
