On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I spend a Distrib-u-Matic card to make "Fix Veto" distributable.
I believe I had an outstanding intent to make this distributable
without objection which was not objected to. I really should mark
these things because I seem to forget every i
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> Is this even possible? Does the "permitted" in the sentence "if no
> other player is permitted to distribute a proposal, anyone can without
> three objections" mean can or may?
It means MAY, but combined with "A player specifically permitt
2009/6/16 Alex Smith
>
> On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 12:39 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
> > I submit the following proposal (II=3, Title="A Terrible Proposal"):
> >
> > Create a rule with the following text:
> > {{{
> > Any set of persons who between them have at least 10 instances of the
> > patent ti
> I intend, without /three/ objections, to make this proposal
> distributable.
Umm, how?
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I used II=2 because I thought it would be a controversial change.
Controversy != complexity.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I spend D# D# D# to flip the Distributability of the Proposal entitled
> "No More Distributability" to Undistributable.
>
> II-2 is unreasonable for a proposal that replaces a rule with the
> exact text it had very recently. This required no
6 matches
Mail list logo
