DIS: Re: BUS: Forming the IBA

2009-05-13 Thread Taral
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:35 PM, comex wrote: > I agree to the following contract: Looks good. I'd like to see something like this: If a player votes KILL on a Motion, eir vote is counted as a vote AGAINST that Motion. Additionally, if the Motion passes, then: a) If that player has no pending O

DIS: Re: BUS: Forming the IBA

2009-05-14 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM, comex wrote: >> }} >> I initiate a Motion to Amend the IBA, with the following amendment: >> ... >> parties. If this contract is ever not a player, any person CAN act on >> its behalf to intend to register and CAN act on its behalf to register. > > AGAINST, I don'

DIS: Re: BUS: Forming the IBA

2009-05-14 Thread Warrigal
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:35 PM, comex wrote: > A person CAN deposit an asset by transferring it to the IBA; e then > gains the Effective Rate in zorkmids. > > The Effective Rate for a deposit is its Rate, multiplied by a value > depending on the number of previous deposits made in the same week >

DIS: Re: BUS: Forming the IBA

2009-05-21 Thread Sean Hunt
comex wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:58 AM, comex wrote: >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> For the second motion, all voters (myself, comex, BobTHJ) voted FOR. >> CoE: I voted AGAINST; I think someone else did as well. Unfortunately >> it looks like several motions, i

DIS: Re: BUS: Forming the IBA

2009-05-21 Thread comex
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:52, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> I act on behalf of the IBA to intend, with Agoran Consent, to register. >> >> I object. >> > I support. I don't see the harm. I ob

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Forming the IBA

2009-05-13 Thread comex
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Taral wrote: > If a player votes KILL on a Motion, eir vote is counted as a vote > AGAINST that Motion. Additionally, if the Motion passes, then: > > a) If that player has no pending Offers, then e ceases to become a > party to the contract at the same time. > b) O

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Forming the IBA

2009-05-13 Thread Taral
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:54 PM, comex wrote: > Hmm.  As long as the vote collector (currently the initiator of the > motion, by default) is required to prominently mention who left, I'm > okay with it, although I don't think it's very likely that a Terrible > Motion will pass. True. I think, act

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Forming the IBA

2009-05-21 Thread comex
That's recorded in the above history, as well as my later retraction (in response to the AAA motion that would make it unnecessary). Sent from my iPhone On May 21, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: comex wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:58 AM, comex wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:31 A