Arguments:
On 11 July 2012 06:19, omd wrote:
> didn't we just have a CFJ about this? :p
No, since the full-width Latin characters are at least intended to
convey the same information as their normal-width counterparts, rather
than simply visually resembling them.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 11 July 2012 01:19, Noé Rubinstein wrote:
>> How the hell would this not be trivially TRUE by rule 754/1?
>
> Those are full-width characters; they are certainly not the usual
> means we would expect actions to be presented in, but more
>
On 11 July 2012 01:19, Noé Rubinstein wrote:
> How the hell would this not be trivially TRUE by rule 754/1?
Those are full-width characters; they are certainly not the usual
means we would expect actions to be presented in, but more
importantly, several players may be unable to view the text corr
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 10 July 2012 14:26, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> Ｉ ｖｏｔｅ ｆｏｒ ｓｃｓｈｕｎｔ．
>
> Fine, I'll do it.
>
> CFJ: I have cast a vote in the current Promotor election.
>
> Arguments: I've honestly forgotten our precedent on this.
How the hell would this no
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:27 AM, ais523 wrote:
> Oh, and I vote for scshunt in the Promotor election.
So do I.
--
Noé Rubinstein.
5 matches
Mail list logo
