On 7/1/2019 10:54 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
What would people feel about bringing that requirement back? I’d make it a
Class 1 crime, not committable more than once in a week, and with
exceptions for emails sent primarily in an official or judicial capacity.
Why don't we just make it a "should
What would people feel about bringing that requirement back? I’d make it a
Class 1 crime, not committable more than once in a week, and with
exceptions for emails sent primarily in an official or judicial capacity.
-Aris
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 10:07 PM Rebecca wrote:
> People should, as used to
People should, as used to be required by law, signature their emails with
their preferred Agoran names, I feel.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:43 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
> That all looks fine, thanks for resolving it quickly.
>
> Side note, I see in your quote introduction that it says "Falsifian". I am
That all looks fine, thanks for resolving it quickly.
Side note, I see in your quote introduction that it says "Falsifian". I am
not Falsifian, I go by Jason Cobb (although I really don't care if that's
shortened or anything). I just don't want any confusion :).
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019, 12:36 AM Edw
4 matches
Mail list logo
