Ed Murphy Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:35:08 -0700
root wrote:
On 6/28/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Human Point Two judges CFJ 1687 FALSE. No arguments? I appeal.
On 6/28/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Human Point Two judges CFJ 1687 FALSE.
No arguments? I appeal.
I don't see a substantive difference between this and "I accept the caller's arguments as valid". To-ma-to, to-mah-to.
