DIS: Re: BUS: Here goes nothing

2012-02-16 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, omd wrote: > I cause Mr. Incredible to make each of the following players inactive: Huh. I could have sworn I secured activity when I used it for a scam last year. > Arguments: Making ais523 inactive is an action that is "not otherwise > IMPOSSIBLE"-- in particular, ais52

DIS: Re: BUS: Here goes nothing

2012-02-16 Thread omd
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Gratuitous:  The first method being limited to the announcer is an > inherent part of it, and similarly without-objection is an inherent > part of the second.  Past exceptions to this common-sense approach > have depended on alternate constructi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Here goes nothing

2012-02-16 Thread omd
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Didn't this come up in another scam, that "otherwise impossible" > includes things that are "regulated" as being "otherwise impossible to > change" except as defined?  I say "came up", I don't say I remember the > decision! http://zenith.homel

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Here goes nothing

2012-02-17 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, omd wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > > Gratuitous:  The first method being limited to the announcer is an > > inherent part of it, and similarly without-objection is an inherent > > part of the second.  Past exceptions to this common-sense appro