On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Sam Benner wrote:
>> I object to my own inactivation.
>
> Too late; the dependent action was already resolved.
However, you can become active again by announcement.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Sam Benner wrote:
> I object to my own inactivation.
Too late; the dependent action was already resolved.
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 09:40 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:19, Sean Hunt wrote:
> >
> > Having received no objections, I make all the quoted players inactive.
> >
> And here I thought I was the only one who believed dependent actions
> were not broken.
A proposal just pass
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:19, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>
>> For each of the following players, I intend, without objection, to make
>> em inactive (I know it's broken now but I hope the Assessor will pass
>> the proposal to repair it quickly).
>>
>> woggle
>> Schrodinger's Cat
>> Jonn
You a Penalty Box? Funny. I accidentally the whole WRV.
On Tuesday, September 15, 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>
> For each of the following players, I intend, without objection, to make
> em inactive (I know it's broken now but I hope the Assessor will pass
> the proposal to repair
2009/9/15 Sean Hunt :
> Sean Hunt wrote:
> (...)
> I a Penalty Box and a WRV to ais523.
>
I don't think this is effective, but fortunately the contract allows
you to complete the win anyway. Congratulations!
--
-Tiger
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Having received no objections, I make all the quoted players inactive.
/me is a lonely cow :(
--
-c.
7 matches
Mail list logo
