Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal, AI=1, II=0, title=inflation
> {{{
> In rule 2138's text, replace each instance of "International" with
> "Intergalactic" and then do the same replacement on the Rule's title.
> }}}
Intergalactic Allmighty Ordinatorus Personali.
(We should have a Creative Office whose p
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Proposal, AI=1, II=0, title=inflation
>> {{{
>> In rule 2138's text, replace each instance of "International" with
>> "Intergalactic" and then do the same replacement on the Rule's title.
>> }}}
>>
>> I intend, with 3 Su
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal, AI=1, II=0, title=inflation
> {{{
> In rule 2138's text, replace each instance of "International" with
> "Intergalactic" and then do the same replacement on the Rule's title.
> }}}
>
> I intend, with 3 Support, to make the above proposal Distributab
On Dec 19, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Josiah Worcester wrote:
The following proposals are submitted by WALRUS (note: 100 proposals).
As the current point of contact for Human Point Two, I am tempted to
have Human.2 declare war against WALRUS -- but I'd have to get an
updated list of the Human.2 m
On 12/19/07, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mark repealing stuff
I will probably vote FOR this, but submit a proposal sometime this
weekend to reintroduce marks with some more useful rewards and ways to
spend them.
On Oct 28, 2007, at 6:32 PM, Josiah Worcester wrote:
On Sunday 28 October 2007 16:09:39 comex wrote:
On behalf of the AFO:
The AFO hereby initiates 10,000 inquiry cases, barring Zefram, for
the
statement:
- This is Sparta
I make the following proposal:
Create a rule named "Judicial abuse"
Pikhq wrote:
On 10/28/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josiah Worcester wrote:
I make the following proposal:
The above 10,000 inquiry cases are removed from the game.
"The above" only makes sense in the context of your message, and will
be quite meaningless in the context of a proposal.
On Sunday 28 October 2007, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Pikhq:
> > All changes to the game state caused by these cases are
> > removed from the game.
>
> Including the changes contained in this sentence? :)
>
> -Goethe
Non-emergency proposals ought not to use the word "gamestate" IMHO.
signature.asc
De
Pikhq:
> All changes to the game state caused by these cases are
> removed from the game.
Including the changes contained in this sentence? :)
-Goethe
On 10/28/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was still in place around Jan-April 2007 when I was CotC. When
> CFJ 1610 came up there was discussion about removing it, but it
> didn't happen until some other time (maybe we all rightly thought
> it was a bad idea to remove, and Zefram sl
Josiah Worcester wrote:
>I make the following proposal:
>The above 10,000 inquiry cases are removed from the game.
"The above" only makes sense in the context of your message, and will
be quite meaningless in the context of a proposal.
-zefram
root wrote:
> It was over a year ago. My recollection is that there was some
> discussion about whether Excess CFJs should be retained or not, but I
> could be wrong.
It was still in place around Jan-April 2007 when I was CotC. When
CFJ 1610 came up there was discussion about removing it, but i
On 10/28/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 28 October 2007, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > It was repealed a year ago because it was deemed restrictive and
> > unnecessary (apparently a mistake), and because crimes and infractions
> > were going out the window.
>
> No, it wasn't. Excess CFJs
comex wrote:
On behalf of the AFO:
The AFO hereby initiates 10,000 inquiry cases, barring Zefram, for the
statement:
- This is Sparta
I recommend assigning chaotic ID numbers to these, if they are
indeed successful.
On Sunday 28 October 2007, Ian Kelly wrote:
> It was repealed a year ago because it was deemed restrictive and
> unnecessary (apparently a mistake), and because crimes and infractions
> were going out the window.
No, it wasn't. Excess CFJs were in the ruleset immediately before the
switch to cri
On 10/28/07, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 28 October 2007 16:09:39 comex wrote:
> > On behalf of the AFO:
> > The AFO hereby initiates 10,000 inquiry cases, barring Zefram, for
> the
> > statement:
> > - This is Sparta
> >
>
> I make the following proposal:
>
> Create a r
On Sunday 28 October 2007 16:09:39 comex wrote:
> On behalf of the AFO:
> The AFO hereby initiates 10,000 inquiry cases, barring Zefram, for
the
> statement:
> - This is Sparta
>
I make the following proposal:
Create a rule named "Judicial abuse", with power 1.4, with the
following text:
A
On Sunday 28 October 2007, Zefram wrote:
> I see you've graduated from merely bad play to outright destructive
> play.
>
> -zefram
Contrary to this claim, I'm not trying to be destructive. Rather, I'm
creating a massive amount of Blue VCs, which temporarily make it much
cheaper to modify VVLOP
comex wrote:
On behalf of the AFO:
The AFO hereby initiates 10,000 inquiry cases, barring Zefram, for the
statement:
- This is Sparta
If this works, I'm only entering the first and last ones into the
database, with an explanatory comment.
comex wrote:
>On behalf of the AFO:
>The AFO hereby initiates 10,000 inquiry cases,
I see you've graduated from merely bad play to outright destructive play.
-zefram
20 matches
Mail list logo
