On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 14:40 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
Arguments:
This is a classical case of the Paradox of Self-Amendment. The rule says
that If any change to the gamestate would cause ... any change in the
effect or attributes of this rule ... including its repeal ... it is
cancelled and
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 02:51:48 pm Ed Murphy wrote:
I initiate an inquiry case on the following statements:
Creating a contract in a public message constitutes an
implicit but nevertheless clear indication that it will be public
when it forms, unless published with an explicit
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I initiate an inquiry case on the following statements:
Fails? This is what linked CFJs are for.
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
-- Unknown
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I initiate an inquiry case on the following statement, disqualifying
ehird:
The AFO is bound by the Russian Roulette contract.
Caller's arguments:
ehird has disclosed the password to me, but (to the best of my
On 10 Oct 2008, at 20:37, comex wrote:
Sorry, but this is trivially TRUE. ehird did, in fact, decide to
disclose the password to the AFO's other partners.
yah, pikhq too
--
ehird
5 matches
Mail list logo
