Maybe try “does not appear to have known”? Otherwise, the gamestate depends on someone’s actual mental state, which is impossible to determine given the limits of current technology.
-Aris On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 4:24 PM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote: > Crap. > > I withdraw that proposal. I resubmit it with AI = 2 and author D. Margaux. > > > On May 26, 2019, at 7:23 PM, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I don’t think we should be fining people for actions unless they knew or > should know they are violating the rules (what the criminal law calls a > “guilty mind”). > > > > I submit a proposal: > > > > Title: Intent is Important > > > > In Rule 2531, in the list that follows this text: > > > > “Any attempt to levy a fine is INEFFECTIVE if:” > > > > Add the following text as paragraph 3: > > > > “(3) the perp did not know and reasonably should not be expected to have > known that e violated the rules as a result of the action or inaction that > is the reason for the levy;” > > > > And renumber the rest of the list accordingly. >
