Walker wrote:
> I publish a NoV accusing Wooble of breaking Rule 2158, a power 2 Rule,
> by failing to judge case 2979 within the time limit.
> I publish a NoV accusing omd of breaking Rule 2158, a power 2 Rule, by
> failing to judge case 2980 within the time limit.
>
> I call for judgement on bo
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Which
> is fine; Contested NoVs are considered "on hold" unless someone raises
> another court case about them.
...and uncontested NoVs do nothing at all at the moment.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 20:29, Charles Walker wrote:
> > I publish a NoV accusing Wooble of breaking Rule 2158, a power 2 Rule,
> > by failing to judge case 2979 within the time limit.
> > I publish a NoV accusing omd of breaking Rule 2158, a power 2 Rule, b
3 matches
Mail list logo