DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, CFJs 2408-2409

2009-03-18 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/3/18 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk: As for the question the CFJ was trying to ask; either a right-side up or upside-down moo would have been appropriate to fulfil the obligation, due to rule 754(1) (they are clearly synonyms in this context). So you're judging that you can agree to an

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, CFJs 2408-2409

2009-03-18 Thread Alex Smith
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 14:33 +, Elliott Hird wrote: 2009/3/18 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk: As for the question the CFJ was trying to ask; either a right-side up or upside-down moo would have been appropriate to fulfil the obligation, due to rule 754(1) (they are clearly synonyms in this