Goethe wrote:
> Due to the LAND GRAB pledge, Goethe is the recordkeeper for the types of
> crops currencies referenced by the Agoran Agricultural Association contract.
While LAND GRAB refers to the AAA, it doesn't explicitly assert the
statement of the CFJ, so the precedent of CFJs 1922-23 shoul
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I CFJ on the following statement:
>
> Due to the LAND GRAB pledge, Goethe is the recordkeeper for the types of
> crops currencies referenced by the Agoran Agricultural Association contract.
>
> Arguments: Two contracts con
On Thu, 1 May 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> Arguments against:
>
> There are multiple persons who have agreed to the Agoran Agricultural
> Association contract but not to the LAND GRAB pledge, and at least one
> of those (me) refuses to agree to any part of the LAND GRAB pledge.
> Therefore, a redefin
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't really expect my scam to work, but I don't think your argument
> here works either. Reason: there's nothing in this argument to say
> why the AAA>LG instead of LG>AAA and without that, the reverse could
> be s
On Thu, 1 May 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> I don't think it does. The AAA creates a legal fiction of crops that
> all of its members agree to. The LG creates a different legal fiction
> of crops that all of its members agree to. The two sets of members
> are totally disjoint, so in fact there is no
On May 2, 2008, at 12:23 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Kerim Aydin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't really expect my scam to work, but I don't think your
argument
here works either. Reason: there's nothing in this argument to say
why the AAA>LG instead of LG>
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There exists the potential for plenty of conflict. See:
> --
> Rule 1586/3 (Power=2)
> Definition and Continuity of Entities
>
> Two Rule-defined entities CANNOT have the same name or nickname.
But are specifi
On Fri, 2 May 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Two Rule-defined entities CANNOT have the same name or nickname.
>
> But are specific currencies "rule-refined entities"? The rules define
> currencies in general, but
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The question is, does an entity defined by an entity defined (...) by an
> entity defined by the Rules reduce to an entity defined by the rules?
>
> I think the Rules are silent here too... no intuition on it.
My opinion
On Fri, 2 May 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> The question is, does an entity defined by an entity defined (...) by an
>> entity defined by the Rules reduce to an entity defined by the rules?
>>
>> I think the Rules are silen
10 matches
Mail list logo
