Re: DIS: Re: BUS: MC

2008-10-07 Thread Sgeo
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 08/10/2008, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I intend, with monstrous consent, to add this rule to the ruleset >>> {Sgeo gains the patent title Sca

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: MC

2008-10-07 Thread Elliott Hird
On 08/10/2008, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I intend, with monstrous consent, to add this rule to the ruleset >> {Sgeo gains the patent title Scamster. This rule repeals itself after >> Sgeo gains the Patent Title Scamster

DIS: Re: BUS: MC

2008-10-07 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I intend, with monstrous consent, to add this rule to the ruleset > {Sgeo gains the patent title Scamster. This rule repeals itself after > Sgeo gains the Patent Title Scamster} FYI, it's uncouth to copy somebody else's scam. -root