On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Jonathan Rouillard <
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Can one intent to deputize on an action that hasn't reached its time
> limit yet? I know I've been slow (haven't been home in a while) and
> it's an unfortunate time to be slow, but as far as I know I have
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
> It's been suggested that it may be useful for me to repeat these intents. So:
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:41 PM, John Smith wrote:
>> In case of emergency:
>>
>> I intend to deputize for the CotC to assign this CfJ.
>> I intend to deputize
On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 22:48 -0400, Craig Daniel wrote:
> It's been suggested that it may be useful for me to repeat these intents. So:
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:41 PM, John Smith wrote:
> > In case of emergency:
> >
> > I intend to deputize for the CotC to assign this CfJ.
> > I intend to dep
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 16:33 -0400, Matt Berlin wrote:
> Does fool's announcement of intent to destroy a promise:
>
> a) destroy the promise
> b) begin the destruction of the promise
> c) schedule the destruction of the promise
> d) place a time-limit on the action of destroying the promise
> e) on
please explain how fool is not a player
1. he is a living entity
2. he is capable of coherent english
3. he did register(I think)
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:47 AM, John Smith wrote:
> If I register between now and when the intent expires, and the CfJ
> assignment is late, I can assign the case
On 2013-07-31, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> It does not say it has to fall into any category, it says that for
> each category it _does_ fall into, the corresponding requirement
> must hold. If it doesn't fall into any, then there is no
> requirement needed.
Ack, thanks. For some reason the "and" bef
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Michael Slone wrote:
I think I'm missing something in the rules, though. Actions
performed with notice require Agoran Satisfaction (1728(c)).
Rule 2124, which defines Agoran Satisfaction, appears to require
the action to fall into one or more of the following categories:
wi
On 2013-07-30, Matt Berlin wrote:
> Does fool's announcement of intent to destroy a promise:
>
> a) destroy the promise
> b) begin the destruction of the promise
> c) schedule the destruction of the promise
> d) place a time-limit on the action of destroying the promise
> e) only announce intent
>
Does fool's announcement of intent to destroy a promise:
a) destroy the promise
b) begin the destruction of the promise
c) schedule the destruction of the promise
d) place a time-limit on the action of destroying the promise
e) only announce intent
I'm approaching from "order of operations".
- a
On 29/07/2013 6:16 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 16:26 -0400, Fool wrote:
I cash the promise titled "!!!" [Text: "!!!". Cashing condition: "This
promise has existed for 2 months." It was created May 21.]
CoE: Which two months has it existed for? June, certainly. But it hasn't
exi
On 29 July 2013 22:30, omd wrote:
> It would, incidentally, be more polite to attempt to achieve a
> dictatorship in a way other than deregistering everyone.
Especially when it would have been just as easy to do it some other,
less annoying, way.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Fool wrote:
> I am, as it happens, a mathematical constructivist. The reasoning is fully
> constructive (goes through in intuitionistic logic).
Please elaborate.
On 29/07/2013 5:30 PM, omd wrote:
I suppose it's
appropriate to say that paraconsistent logic isn't an appropriate
answer; unless the rules use language that expect us to work
indirectly to determine the possibility of an action, it's necessary
to go all the way to intuitionistic logic.
I am, a
13 matches
Mail list logo
