On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 01:19 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
I cause Rule 2380 to cause Rule 2361 to become a Slave Golem.
I CFJ { Rule 2361 is a Slave Golem. }
If Rule 2361 is a Slave Golem, I cause Rule 2380 to transfer it from the
LFD to me.
Arguments:
The only reason I can think of that
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Arguments: this fails due to rule 2150; a rule needs power at least 2 to
define an entity as a person. Defining a rule as a golem is defining it
to be a person, among other things.
Arguments: As I mentioned on IRC, clearly if
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:42 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
I cause Rule 2380 to cause Rule 2361 to become a Slave Golem.
Criminal case: Rule 2361 has violated Rule 101 by failing to treat
Agora right good
there is probably something i missed in the rules but i did not know a rule
could become a golem
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.cawrote:
I cause Rule 2380 to cause Rule 2361 to become a Slave Golem.
I CFJ { Rule 2361 is a Slave Golem. }
If Rule 2361 is
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote:
there is probably something i missed in the rules but i did not know a
rule could become a golem
There is nothing prohibiting it (except, perhaps, Rule 2140).
-scshunt
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 01:49 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal: Decomposition (AI=2)
{{{
Append The basis of a Golem is that of its owner. to Rule
2360.
}}}
Given the number of recursive Golem loops we have at the moment, this
doesn't seem like a particularly well-defined definition.
--
6 matches
Mail list logo
