Oh, I'm just an all-round chaotic neutral. It doesn't really change the
game if it were to pass, so it'd be more interesting if it wasn't fixed.
On Sun, 14 July 2024, 1:11 pm Janet Cobb via agora-discussion, <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 7/13/24 22:09, Matt Smyth via agora-busine
On 7/13/24 22:09, Matt Smyth via agora-business wrote:
> I object.
I think this fails, as it isn't clear which intent (or both) is being
objected to.
Also, can I ask why?
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> > [added 'unconditional' because conditional voting makes this trivial]
> >
> > I remove my proposal, Back to Basics, from the Pool.
> >
> > I submit the following Proposal, Back to Basics, AI-1:
>
> I'd
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
[added 'unconditional' because conditional voting makes this trivial]
I remove my proposal, Back to Basics, from the Pool.
I submit the following Proposal, Back to Basics, AI-1:
I'd imagine this sort of thing would be more interesting with secret
vote
Recommend changing to "paragraphs". Not sure if that's enough of an
ambiguity to make it fail.
-scshunt
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> [added 'unconditional' because conditional voting makes this trivial]
>
> I remove my proposal, Back to Basics, from the Pool.
>
> I s
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 11:08 -0800, John Smith wrote:
> I suggest that a player proposes to add "Ratifying a public document
> is a passive method of deregistration unless the document claims
> otherwise" to the rules somewhere, because changing a person's
> citizenship by ratification is usually a
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Flameshadowxeroshin
wrote:
> I become active.
Am I going to have widen my AUTHOR column?
—Machiavelli, whose own name is currently the longest he has to account for
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 09/30/2010 09:14 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > coppro wrote:
> >
> > > On 09/30/2010 07:28 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > > > I CFJ on the statement "At some time in the past, Keba was the Speaker",
> > > > barring Wooble.
> > > >
> > > > Arguments: Rule 2315 on
On 09/30/2010 09:14 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
On 09/30/2010 07:28 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
I CFJ on the statement "At some time in the past, Keba was the Speaker",
barring Wooble.
Arguments: Rule 2315 only allows initialisation the List of Succession
"as soon as possible after this prop
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Herald's, but yeah, if the list self-ratified (per Rule 2314) at any
> point then the first paragraph of Rule 2315 is no longer relevant.
The IADoP's list of officers is self-ratifying, regardless of whether
the List itself managed to go unchall
coppro wrote:
> On 09/30/2010 07:28 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> I CFJ on the statement "At some time in the past, Keba was the Speaker",
>> barring Wooble.
>>
>> Arguments: Rule 2315 only allows initialisation the List of Succession
>> "as soon as possible after this proposal takes effect"; unfortuna
On 09/30/2010 07:28 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
I CFJ on the statement "At some time in the past, Keba was the Speaker",
barring Wooble.
Arguments: Rule 2315 only allows initialisation the List of Succession
"as soon as possible after this proposal takes effect"; unfortunately,
rule 2315 is not a prop
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > I accuse coppro of violating the 1-Power Rule 2143 by publishing a
> > report stipulating the Proposal Pool to be empty when it in fact
> > contained a proposal entitled {Judicial Sanctions}
13 matches
Mail list logo
