On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:25, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:20 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership
perlno...@nomictools.com wrote:
This message serves to announce and make effective changes to
the list of parties to the PerlNomic Partnership (a public contract).
CoE:
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 13:50 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 09:25, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:20 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership
perlno...@nomictools.com wrote:
This message serves to announce and make effective changes to
the list of parties
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:53 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
PerlNomic's sufficiently automated that it's likely to keep on sending
them, oblivious to the circumstances, until someone tells it to shut up.
The notifications to Agora have to be sent by a logged-in user. Votes
on
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 11:25 -0400, comex wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:20 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership
perlno...@nomictools.com wrote:
This message serves to announce and make effective changes to
the list of parties to the PerlNomic Partnership (a public contract).
CoE: The PNP
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:35 PM, The PerlNomic Partnership
perlno...@nomictools.com wrote:
The current list of parties is:
Nickname Email
Dvorak dvorak.herr...@gmail.com
RainerWasserfuhr
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 5:33 PM, The PerlNomic Partnership
perlno...@nomictools.com wrote:
This message serves to announce and make effective changes to
the list of parties to the PerlNomic Partnership (a public contract).
The current list of parties is:
Nickname
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gratuitous arguments:
I believe Warrigal is the Executor of the quoted message from the PNP
(based on http://nomic.info/perlnomic/log.txt ).
You are correct, but I don't believe that makes any non-GUILTY
judgement
On 10 Dec 2008, at 04:46, Warrigal wrote:
I zoop a criminal case against the PerlNomic Partnership for violating
Rule 2215 by announcing that I am a party to it in the quoted message.
You ARE a party to it.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Warrigal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're not a member of the Partnership, the PNP CANNOT act by your
actions using the mechanisms of the game and thus did not publish that
message.
How do you conclude that?
You quoted it yourself:
The PerlNomic Partnership
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Warrigal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I zoop a criminal case against the PerlNomic Partnership for violating
Rule 2215 by announcing that I am a party to it in the quoted message.
I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal CFJ against Warrigal
for violating
On 10 Dec 2008, at 14:00, Warrigal wrote:
A player plays Bolero by making an announcement (other than an
announcement of eir deregistration).
This is where it fails.
Well, it also fails in that contracts are explicitly restricted
in Agora. But if it was a real game, that'd be where it fails.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Dec 2008, at 14:00, Warrigal wrote:
A player plays Bolero by making an announcement (other than an
announcement of eir deregistration).
This is where it fails.
Well, it also fails in that contracts are explicitly
On 10 Dec 2008, at 14:18, Warrigal wrote:
playing Bolero therefore indicates that one agrees to this contract.
No dice.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Dec 2008, at 14:00, Warrigal wrote:
A player plays Bolero by making an announcement (other than an
announcement of eir deregistration).
This is where it fails.
Well, it also fails in that contracts are explicitly
Warrigal wrote:
This is a public contract and a pledge known as Wooble's Mousetrap.
Parties to this contract are known as Mice. Every player who makes an
announcement (other than an announcement of eir deregistration) is a
Mouse; no other persons are Mice. Mice SHALL do anything Warrigal
On 10 Dec 2008, at 19:02, Ed Murphy wrote:
IMO, becoming an active player of PerlNomic constitutes sufficiently
explicit, willful consent to satisfy R101(iii), whereas merely
making
an announcement does not. Similarly for the others. (I would cite
CFJ
1290, but the standard at that time
woggle wrote:
I believe Warrigal is the Executor of the quoted message from the PNP
(based on http://nomic.info/perlnomic/log.txt ).
Gratuituous evidence: Relevant line of the log cited by woggle:
Tue Dec 9 20:38:54 2008 - update_agora.cgi: ihope sent a message with
subject 'PNP Parties
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Warrigal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:38 PM, The PerlNomic Partnership
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This message serves to announce and make effective changes to
the list of parties to the PerlNomic Partnership (a public contract).
The
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Warrigal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:38 PM, The PerlNomic Partnership
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This message serves to announce and make effective changes to
the list of parties to the PerlNomic Partnership (a public contract).
The
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Warrigal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Claim of error: I am not a party to the PerlNomic Partnership.
I don't see Warrigal on that list. :D
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
-- Unknown
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Warrigal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Claim of error: I am not a party to the PerlNomic Partnership.
I don't see Warrigal on that list. :D
I do.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:15 PM, The PerlNomic
21 matches
Mail list logo
